Thread:Alex2424121/@comment-24602967-20151223124313/@comment-5091911-20151223142322

Weedle McHairybug wrote:

Alex2424121 wrote:

First of all, I don't force my beliefs onto others (and even if I did, people interacting just results in beliefs being forced onto others), not to mention I AM willing to concede I'm wrong only if I'm proven absolutely, and absolute is the key term there, since if there's even a slight inconsistency in something working 100% regarding their evidences, I won't concede defeat. Second of all, I'm no feminist at all, haven't been since 2011, and if anything I'm fighting against feminism. Third of all, I'm not crazy. I may have aspergers, but I am legally sane. I'll even undergo a psychiatric test if I must prove it. Perhaps your determination is the problem. You lack self control when it comes to a conflict with who is right and who is wrong. I and everyone else knows what You are like, and its problem. I told you that your evidence on Airel's specific birthday was not good enough but you remained insistent, You were told several times not to revert back discarded information you do it anyway, I tell you not to barge in on messages that are none of your business but you do just that, I tell you to leave Duke alone but you continue to hold a grudge against him, We try to reason with you when we don't approve the things you do but always try to get the last word, resulting in getting people upset and annoyed.

You need to listen to people instead of listening to yourself. Trying to get your way and displaying lack of respect towards users and the Admins is why everyone displays no loyalty or respect towards you. First of all, Hans Christian Andersen WAS actually VERY good evidence, certainly good enough evidence to take it into account. In fact, the ending of the episode even directly acknowledged his writing the original tale. Also, it was birthyear, not birthday.

Second of all, that discarded information was needed. In fact, I'll even PROVE how it was needed: For the point on how Ariel's motivation didn't tie to Eric at all, Linda Woolverton claimed that Belle was the first Disney Princess to not wait for her prince to come, despite it being clearly false in Ariel's case, as she was motivated to be among humanity long before she was even aware of Eric's existence. And I've already seen plenty of people acting as though Ariel only wanted to become human because of Eric, and even CITED IMDb as well.

And as far as Duke Remington, many times he comes after me, and I have to defend myself, not to mention many times he also attacks me even when I don't even interact with him at all, like claiming I'm "wrong as usual" and intimidating even when I don't intimidate and even explained how I would have intimidated if I wanted to and cited personal experience on how I was intimidated by other users for how I know this. If you were truly a just mod, you would have banned him permanently, without mercy, especially when he's not the type to be shown mercy at all since her never EVER learns from his mistakes.

@Grand Master Mario: I am aware of that, and quite frankly, porn is bad. The Catechism makes explicit that porn is bad, period, and can result in eternal damnation. And actually, no, one CAN'T wear whatever they want. In fact, Exhibitionism is a crime, as is streaking or indecent exposure. Unlike you Weedle McHairybug, Duke knows when to shut up and listen. You are always trying to get the last word in hopes of getting your way. I am not soft, there is more to being and Administrator than punishing users who do bad things. You should be lucky that I am allowing you to be back on here.

You are not in charge here, me and the Administrators are. We say how this wikia should be run, not you. Your hard working research is no longer acceptable here. You want to display your speculations and theories, then go and start your own wikia, right whatever you want. Your wikia your rules.