Thread:Duke Remington/@comment-1672596-20140918004156/@comment-1672596-20140918011224

Duke Remington wrote: Please don't argue with me anymore. They're still not canon, no matter what, so please don't argue. I don't need any heart attacks. The sometimes moniker needs to remain next to certain allies and enemies of his to reflect the neutrality of it all and keep it completely accurate.(Like with Sorcerers of the Magic Kingdom--Genie and Iago are enemies, even though the non-canon sequels and series made them friends, so the "sometimes" has to be listed for that reason.)

And while you're at it, please tell Weedle to stop arguing with me and leave me alone. Besides, his theories are moot and futile and also mean nothing. He's also clearly disregarding common sense and trying to get me in trouble again. Actually, SilverFlight is actually on the same level as you, so I suggest you heed his (her?) advice. And when the company constantly rereleases the sequels, and still airs the shows they made on Disney Junior, common sense would dictate they still view it as canon. I know plenty of franchises that actively avoid rereleasing anything they consider non-canon for various reasons (for example, the Metal Gear franchise, even if the definition is loosely applied to simply it only not being mentioned by the creator, despite events from that game being mentioned in other entries). If anything, you're the one lacking in common sense. Think about it, if a company considers something non-canon, made clear it wasn't canon, and basically admitted the films they are releasing didn't help their company at all, don't you think they'd, you know, avoid rereleasing the films they stated were non-canon?