Talk:Claude Frollo/@comment-32119671-20180311012516/@comment-1672596-20180501024642

"ok so we are not going to see eye to eye on this he did not misrepresent fact since the fact that there was no innocent people in the village because he would not have killed innocent people because he also stated that he can not violate his own law so him saying that there were no innocent really meant that THERE WAS NO INNOCENT he did not misrepresent fact he told him like it was that there were no innocent people besides lot and his family. It also was stated that God for years had tried to turn those of the city from their wicked ways yet they refused. also, you as a person learn from your surroundings as such it is highly likely that the entire town was corrupt and vile. It is no different than those who live in a Korea they all believe that their Leader is god and untouchable. abraham was thinking as a human assuming that there were those who were evil, however, in reality, there was no good in that town as such God took his will to smite them. he violated no law as he did everything he was supposed to do as Daniel stated in the bible, "he punished them like a parent to a child" but it seems we are getting too heated about this so maybe it is best we leave this alone and agree to disagree. "

No, if he didn't misrepresent facts, he would have shot down ANY attempts at bartering, even go so far as to psychologically torture Abraham, like what I wrote regarding my rendition of that exact bartering situation. Saying he would spare it if there were 50, giving him false hopes that there were innocents, IS misrepresenting facts. Like I said, had I been God, I would have done exactly as I had written God to do and shot down any attempt at bartering before Abraham could even try it. And I also wouldn't even care to convert them back, having long predicted that they'd fall to sin since before I even created Adam and Eve (another way to frame omniscience is how Palpatine put it: "Everything that has transpired has done so according to my design."). Again, being truly honest would have literally required shooting down any attempts at bartering with him, or especially indicating there was any chance at there being innocents.

And for the record, if I were to be a parent, then if my child disobeyed, my punishment to the child would most likely have the child be sent to the ICU, leaving them terrified of ever disobeying me again, and that's IF they survive the ordeal.