User talk:Lyght/Archival Quality/March-April 2010

Archives: September 2009-February 2010, March-April 2010

I hope it's okay with you...
...that I've archived your talk page, as you can see. Maybe you should try archiving your talk page once in a while.

L D E J R u f f  (see what I've contributed ) 16::56, 13 March 2010 (EDT)

Hey1234
Could you please talk some sense into Hey1234? I've been making edits and correcting mistakes on the pages for characters like Mickey Mouse, Tinker Bell, and the Dalmatian Puppies, but he keeps undoing my edits despite the fact that the edits I'm making are completely true! Please make him stop. --JeremyCreek 04:11, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Help rid us of Non Disney please
PLEASE!!!!!! It's all spam!!! And I redid all these crappy stubs too! Poff 14:32, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

This has to be a mistake. R rated movies on A DISNEY WIKIA? Some are Don Bluth vandals some are the other 98 ips I don't know but please do something! Poff 22:51, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Disneylover
Okay, now I need help talking some sense into Disneylover. Like Hey1234 before her, she keeps undoing the edits I've been making to the character pages, even though the information I'm adding is completely true! She won't even let the Dalmatian Puppies article keep its list of the pups' names because she think it looks sloppy (which it doesn't if you ask me). Please make her stop. --JeremyCreek 07:11, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

I want to put back some of those edits actually. I would do it. Poff 22:52, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Hey1234
Exscuse me for bothering you but I created the page of Dalmatian Puppies. It was fine the way it was. Disneylover put hs information on another page. He is the only one against two users who think it's fine without the list. Please can you revert it back to it's form before the list. Thank You Hey1234
 * No no no, you're wrong. A separate article just for listing the puppies' names is redundant and makes for too short a page. Plus, it is pointless to keep the general descriptions of the pups that have their own articles now. Please just accept that my edits are the "fine" ones. And that applies to Disneylover too; the facts I put down are all true! --JeremyCreek 05:20, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Folks, this is why I protected the article. There's clearly an edit war going on here that is unproductive. I don't see any problem with having the list. Nor do I see why it's such a huge ordeal. --Lyght 09:40, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem is, Hey1234 and Disneylover claim it makes the page look sloppy, but I think it looks better that way. Also, Disneylover keeps undoing my edits to Donald Duck's article (such as minimizing the paragraph about his appearance on Bonkers), even though I'm basically improving that page to make it look not sloppy. --JeremyCreek 18:42, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Disneylover
I must agree with Hey1234.

Phineas and Ferb vandals
Please ban the IPs at 68.183.52.25 and 12.39.109.152. They keep making up crap on the articles for the Phineas and Ferb characters, such as Phineas and Candace being of royalty or Dr. Doofenshmirtz being sucked into a black hole. I keep undoing their spam, but no matter how many times I tell them to stop it, they just keep inserting this slander! Please ban them so that they won't be able to do it anymore. --JeremyCreek 22:14, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome, really appriceate it.
This is a very useful wiki for Walt Disney characters, by the way. That's what I really like about this website. BlazeTheMovieFan 00:27, March 31, 2010 (UTC)