Thread:Alex2424121/@comment-30592523-20161205200912

Why are you undoing the edits that are correcting information?

Almost all of the page of Atka was incorrect, just watch Brother Bear 2 and you'll see. That description matches Gaston, not Atka. There is little to no personality revealed about him and he is not a villain, there's no proof anywhere in the movie that he doesn't believe the spirits either.

All I did was to remove the bias and leave the information as factual as possible. The same goes for the other pages.

So now The Bear from The Fox and the Hound is an evil monster but Koda's mother isn't even though the Bear didn't kill anyone but Koda's mother got Sitka killed? And she is an antagonist too in the first movie, since she opposed the protagonist.

Denahi is also the main antagonist of the first Brother Bear movie, because he is the one that opposes the protagonist the most (even if it was just a misunderstanding). He was already added in the category of Antagonist related to the main character (and even in the categories of Villain and Anti-Villain, which is impossible for the same character to be at the same time).

Man from Bambi isn't evil either, the alignment would be neutral, due to not being on the same side of the animals. The threat type of antagonist isn't evil, it's like a force of nature, do you say a tornado or a volcano are evil for wrecking havoc on a city? No.

Ronno is also just a rival type of antagonist, not an evil monster who got everyone killed or killed them himself. He is on the same side of the rest of the animals of the forest.

You are an admin and it's your responsibility to remove the bias of the wiki, not favor it... No wonder the wiki is full of biased and incorrect information, and the less people look to it for facts anymore (due to it not being trustworthy in its information). 