Thread:Hey1234/@comment-5111231-20181028165946

Hi Hey, To stop this from turning ugly, I do want to hear you out over making the WiR version of OMD. I understand why you'd make it - it's a fictional version of the real thing and a product of the film, of course - and that's not wrong to have that in mind. But there are some things that don't add well to the page's structure that makes it problematic. For one, it's a location of a pre-existing real-life location (in this case a website); yet for all the other articles about real-life locations, we don't create subpages of the fictional ones, we composite them. Another thing is if we're talking in context of the franchise here, then making a separate page on the location version of Oh My Disney feels off-tone, compared to pages like Sugar Rush, Fix-It Felix, Jr., and Hero's Duty, who have tabs for the console and location versions. And as for the page you've written for it, while it is very descriptive, the problem is it is only descriptive; when reading it, all it talks about is the site's superficial details, but it doesn't give much about the website. I'd compare it to seeing a flyer for a Disney Park - you know, like it shows all the stuff that's there (people, attractions, subjects), but there's nothing that talks about the park itself, its history, its purpose, etc. The way it does sound is something better suited for other pages that need a description when talking about OMD.

Minor mention, also, is using the "Ralph Breaks the Internet" subtitle instead of "Wreck-It Ralph". Shouldn't we use the franchise name for subtitles to avoid overspecification?

But anyway, that's my part, and I'm sure you have reasons too; I just wanted to provide feedback to that before you think about reinforcing the page again. I don't want this to turn into a dispute, but I do want this to be understood. That's why I recommended making a tabber version on the original OMD page to satisfy both at once without having to convolute things. 