Thread:Bjnboy/@comment-1672596-20130825220124/@comment-1469747-20130825221602

Weedle McHairybug wrote: Bjnboy wrote: I see your position somewhat, but what about the mods or the admins? Could they perhaps lock the pages and any changes must be subject to approval? Or perhaps make a controversy subsection where criticism and only criticism must go?

I once asked something similar about starting a series of Pokemon character articles. The admins refused under the premise that it would be too risky due to the series popularity of including things never actually covered in the films human characters or actual pokemon, or events for any movie characters not directly covered under the films and were instead in the main series when Disney had brief production of the brand. I suspect they'll give a similar response regarding that.

Perhaps, but I would still like to personally ask what they think because I am personally still not kosher with the idea of omitting all negativity whatsoever from any article. I never had the experiences you did, but I do not think that what you say should be a reason to exclude any and all criticism... that would be like if Wikipedia or any review or any journalistic piece excised all details of controversy or negativity just because it could become a reason to dislike something.

However, if the admins say no, then I won't pursue this matter again.