Talk:Giants/@comment-5847396-20140806085231/@comment-5342139-20140814133657

if u haven't hard of anyone saying Tangled started it, u didn't search it up then. but im not saying you're wrong. its all about opinions anyway. Which film ended the Golden Age? Bambi? Aristocats? Fox and Hound? its all based on fan speculation.

sure, it was a success, but DISNEY thinks its disappointment, NOT me. you keep saying its not a disappointment, but that's not up to you to decide. I love TPATF. but DISNEY thought it was disappointing. im not saying the film was bad. it was great. im just telling u what DISNEY thinks.

and quoted right from this wiki: Pocahontas opened on June 23, 1995 to mixed reviews. As of September 2010, review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes gave the film a "rotten" rating of 56% based on reviews from 50 critics and reports a rating average of 6 out of 10. At Metacritic, which assigns a weighted average score out of 100 to reviews from mainstream critics, the film received an average score of 58 based on 23 reviews. The film was harshly criticized by Chief Roy Crazy Horse as historically inaccurate and offensive for glossing over more negative treatment of Pocahontas and her tribe by the English. He claims that Roy Disney refused the tribe's offers to help create a more culturally and historically accurate film. An editorial in the Los Angeles Times pointed out America's fascination with the Indian princess who was rarely shown as having anything more important in her life than her male relationships.

it wasn't at all well-received. mixed reviews to be honest. all of the Disney review sites ive been to criticized Pocahontas. and it got Oscar for the songs. not the story. not anything else. just the scores and the songs which are great, but just those alone cannot save a film if its story is bad or its character isn't good.

of course Pocahontas is better than the old passive princesses. Let's just hope kids know that and start buying more Mulan and Pocahontas merchandise.