Talk:Hans/@comment-1765692-20150319042816/@comment-1765692-20150320160809

Don't get me wrong, I'm not against the idea of him being reformed, as long as it's done well. None of that 'easily forgiven' bullcrap. For him to be redeemed, he has to go through the wringer.

As for the other post... haven't you figured it out yet? I had my emotions under control the whole time. I merely pretended to lose it in order to provoke a reaction. Of course, I was trying to provoke Weedle, but got you instead. I even got you to sink to my level, going to a few of my older comments and leaving replies. That was amusing.

And what have I done, but rebuff the people who disagreed with me? Descendants being similar to an earlier product, merchandise of a live-action character requiring an actor's likeness, adaptations not having to be faithful in order to be good. Those were all arguments where I rebuffed the opposition, and at least managed to get my point across.

I should point out your use of ad hominem in that post. Half-arsed clown? That's a real step up from what I was doing.

Anyway, back to Hans. You should really learn to practice what you preach, boy. Saying that I don't respect other peoples' opinions... I've seen you harass users who disagree with you about Hans. You tell me I "haven't understood anything from the movie," the same way I call some of the people here stupid. But of course to you, I'm just a heartless person who can't learn to forgive, since I'm going against your naive opinions.