Talk:Disney Princess/@comment-3055299-20150515153714/@comment-1894786-20150614034041

I mean... It's a strip of land not owned by any country... And the father did promise to make his daughter a princess... And he's going to make the monarchy like in England, where the royalty are just there to be pretty, while the country itself becomes focused on Green Energy endeavors... I don't see anything wrong with this at all, politically.

What I do take issue with, though is the idea that for Disney's 3rd film based in Africa (after The Lion King and Tarzan) that they still won't introduce any African people (Tarzan had all white people, Lion King had all animals). Though to be fair, North Sudan is east of Egypt, so any movie that would be based off of that region AND be culturally accurate would utilize Middle Eastern peoples, not Africans (Egypt may be politcally part of the African continent, but religiously and culturally they're much closer to those of Arabian descent).

So at worst, we get an American White Princess. At best, we get another Middle Eastern Princess to go along with Jasmine. But sad to say we're still not getting an African princess.