Thread:ChloeElsaKendall/@comment-5483334-20140311105101/@comment-5483334-20140318101821

Actually, there are no two protagonists, cos by definition the protagonist is the one most important character...

Elsa is the deuteragonist, and doubles as the antagonist because she is the source of conflict. They are not wrong definition-wise to say that Elsa is the antagonist, and also, "antagonist" is not necessarily a word conveying negative emotions, it refers to the impediment to the protagonist's goal (which Elsa indeed is to Anna).

Close-ups of her feet that lasted for 1 sec I don't care about. I don't care much for the gay characters also actually, not because I don't like them but because their role is minor (sure he saved Anna from hypothermia but he didn't take her to her sister and then Hans on a mighty steed).

As to my question and your response:

Elsa certainly did not need water..she surrounds herself with it. But there is no logical way a person who would assumably be well-fed and well-cared-for in a castle be fit to RUN up a whole flight of stairs, let alone FIGHT two armed soldiers, having gone without food for 48+ hours. Elsa got up the mountain pretty quick because the cold never bothered her anyway, but Anna and her horse would be trembling considering how they didn't even bring winter garb and would not have made good progress. Frozen berries are also not likely because the whole North Mountain was devoid of foliage. You can see the whole peak during the first few seconds of Let It Go and there are no trees. My conclusion is that these were lapses in attention on Disney's part, but heck, save the retrospective discoveries, they made a terrific film.

P.S. milady Elsa can fight off two men with crossbows after a 3-day fast, what are 4-5 wolves to her while she's still brimming with energy? Probably they'd get enchanted by her awesome and faint of swoon. :P