Talk:Claude Frollo/@comment-26200221-20150909152526/@comment-1635429-20151214174214

I'd have to agree with Satsuki. There's no denying Maleficent is an evil figure, but she definitely isn't leagues above some other characters. I wouldn't even say she's the most evil. A title means nothing, honeslty, but what makes her evil is the fact that she causes havoc for minimal, to no reason. She mostly does it because she can/wants to. But the same can be said about Shan Yu. Their goals are both driven by the fact that they want to prove how evil they are, so what's the real difference?

When it comes to Candy, his villainy is driven by the fact that he's selfish and feels entitled, which is almost as bad as being evil just to be evil, considering his motivations result in the deaths of two games (worlds, basically) and presumably their inhabitants, the near-death of a child, and the near destruction of an entire universe filled with sentient characters with actual lives and emotions. If you're going by actions shown in the actual movies they originate from, I'd say Shan Yu, King Candy, and certainly Frollo, outrank Maleficent quite a bit.