Talk:Frozen II/@comment-7167213-20200213190110

Okay, there are quite a few problems I have with Frozen II once I did some more digging into history. First off, most of the African slaves from the Danish slave trade went to the Danish West Indies, not to Scandinavia itself so the African population shouldn't be there. Plus Norway would be united with Denmark in King Runeard's reign so at Runeard's death and the news of Arendelle and Denmark being a separate kingdom, Mattias would have gone back to the Danish gold coast to help the Danish control their colonial territory as he would owe no direct allegiance to Elsa or Anna. Also, another inaccuracy is that when Elsa is in Ahtohallen, King Runeard is depicted in his teen years reading Hans Christian Anderson's Little Mermaid which was written in 1837 but the first Frozen film takes place in July of 1839 and there is no way Agnar could have aged so fast and had Elsa and Anna in such a short amount of time in just two years which shows this film's inconsistency with the first film so I can't really take this film seriously, and that's coming from a die hard Frozen fan.