Talk:Claude Frollo/@comment-32119671-20180311012516/@comment-35456618-20180501014348

Ok here is the problem we are concerning 2 different things. God in Old Testament was a God of law meanwhile God of NT, New Testament, was the god of the second redemption. As such Jesus was meant to fulfill that law. The reason why Jesus cursed the Tree was that the tree refused to produce fruit when it was its season. The whipping in the square was because the Pedalers were charging astronomical prices for poor people to pay for sacrifices and he was enraged that they were ripping people off. Frollo and many Christians of that time were concerned with the NT and because of that they Fundamentally disregarded the text that they are trying to uphold. And to answer your first part of the comments. If you are a King you can do as you see fit. as far as I can Tell there is nothing that would be able to challenge God, and as such those whom the king deems evil would be destroyed. He has full power over what he can and cant does. so why not? I know it sounds morbid but since God is "King" why wouldn't he punish his creation as he sees fit? If I warned someone time and time again, "Hey don't do this otherwise there will be consequences," and it happens why is that bad? I'm not trying to justify anything but if I warned you several times to not or to do something and they are punished why is that a problem? both Jesus and God in the NT refuted the idea of unclean vs clean food saying man could eat whatever they wanted. they refuted the idea of stoning a "sinner" since every man has sinned. They refuted the idea of sacrifices since the "Son" was killed on the cross ripping the veil thus man and God can be closer to each other. They refuted the Idea in the OT that resurrection is impossible and ungodly with the resurrection of Lazarus. The NT refuted the idea of the Old Covenant where man had to do everything exactly to the T to get the things God wanted out of life. The NT refuted the law of the Ten Commandments as the greatest and only Commandment is to Love thy neighbor as self, meaning they shouldn't kill and disrespect their "brothers". It refuted the way Blessings were handed out since now it wanst just for Jews it was for Gentiles and the "outsiders" as well that is what Esmerelda song was talking about how his grace and love should extend outward to all people, that is what the Priest/Father was telling her that it is open to all people. It didn't EXPLICITLY state that it refuted the old laws but that there are things that the NT refutes and should not be followed as it would drive a man into the dirt/insanity that is why one is meant to take both books and asses and adress each looking at both books. God the Father the Son are supposedly the same person so when Jesus was talking to the woman at the well who wanst a jew or a Christian he had every right to kill and plague that woman but he didn't instead he talked and listened to her he instructed her to something and she did and she became a Christian. So again no he wouldn't.