Talk:Sarousch/@comment-30070528-20170109212942/@comment-33014003-20180222184653

Frollo's actions are much more sadistic, vile and heinous than the acts committed by Sarousch. Frollo murdered an innocent woman, attempted to drown a baby, named the child Quasimodo after his deformities, shunned him from the outside world, lied to him about his mother abandoning him, made him think of himself as a monster, lusted after and groped Esmeralda, burned down all of Paris to find her, tried to murder an innocent family, attempted to commit genocide with the gypsies like Hitler did with the Jews, forced Esmeralda to either choose between forcibly becoming his lover although he knows it's against her will (essentially rape), or be burned to death, tried to ask Quasimodo for forgiveness when Esmeralda seemingly died, only to try to stab him to death, and attempted to murder both Quasimodo and Esmeralda on top of Notre Dame while taunting Quasimodo about the murder of his mother. Sarousch was just a petty thief who robbed, stole, cheated and lied who at one point threatened a young child, but that's still tamer by comparison to Frollo attempting to drown a baby. Frollo is much more of a delusional Knight Templar than Sarousch, but that doesn't make him any less evil!