Thread:Disney dork777/@comment-4864742-20140116034220/@comment-366087-20140117040627

What I don't like here is another wiki dictating what *this* wiki's contents and scope should be. Wikia's stance is that multiple wikis about the same topic can and should be able to *both* cover the material and exist in parallel.

Up until seeing that IRC convo, I was okay with Wookieepedians, but now I'm having to reconsider my opinion. Seems they don't like the idea that The Mouse's Ownership now opens their rather sizeable slice of the franchise's coverage to wikis they never imagined would be able to lay claim to it, especially one the size of Disney Wiki.

Well swallow my lightsabre.

Granted, we should have our articles worded so they are not complete clones of each other, in fact and I've said it before, some of our articles need to be brief intros to the character and focus to the topic, then linked to a more comprehensive source to another on the wikimap or other. For example, articles about Real People. Essays here should focus on their life and contributions to The Mouse, then linked to their WP pages should someone care to read about them further beyond this wiki's scope.

But to allow another wiki to dictate what is allowable content here is… the *height* of utter [censored language to make sailors cringe] in my not-so-humble opinion.