Talk:Frozen 2/@comment-26025032-20150312185644/@comment-1672596-20150313114808

"DTV sequels were not from WDAS. Frozen 2 is going to be produced by WDAS and going to have a theatrical release. I don't like the idea at al... "

They WERE from Disney, though. And besides, need I really remind you that they did the Rescuers Down Under, which IS from WDAS (well, it's predecessor at least)? And I actually thought that was a very good movie.

"And Enchanted Christmas was definitely not better than Beauty and the Beast - why would you even say that?!?."

Ah, let's see, Belle actually came across as an actual internal beauty in that movie, akin to Cinderella and Snow White, instead of a jerk like in the first BATB; the villain Forte was actually far better done than Gaston was, especially in regards to plotting (I grimace at the whole stupidity of the Gaston reprise where he practically blurted out far too many key details of his evil plan in public, and without even trying to sugarcoat the details either. At least Forte was smart enough to actually keep the details to himself, only divulging the details to Fife, and even then keeping some details entirely to himself like the fact that the music sheets were blank.) and actually nearly succeeding in his goals without making the heroes look like they were brain damaged (unlike with Gaston, where the only reason Gaston and Beast even ended up fighting each other was because Belle got the extremely stupid idea to expose Beast to a congregated mob as well as to Gaston, while with Forte, because he kept most of the details of his agenda to himself, he actually nearly succeeded in ruining Belle and Beast's relationship, and even ensuring Beast was doomed to remain a beast for all time by having him smash the rose. The only reason it failed is because just as he was about to smash the rose, a petal fell on Belle's Christmas present.); Forte's motives, unlike Gaston's, actually made some degree of sense (Let's see, with Gaston, probably the closest thing to a motive for his actions is that he wants to bed Belle for being the most beautiful woman in the village. Problem is, she's outranked by the Bimbettes by a significant margin, meaning when taking into account shallowness, it doesn't work. Forte, on the other hand, was pretty much driven mad by the curse, began to see his new form as actually being useful to Beast, and wanted to retain that usefulness in any way, even if it meant preventing the curse from ever being broken). Oh, and this time around, Belle does have a foil of sorts in the form of Angelique, maybe not in terms of inner vs outer beauty, but at least in something (Belle is more optimistic in regards to Christmas, while Angelique, for perfectly understandable reasons, was more cynical about it, at least initially). Those are all reasons why Enchanted Christmas was actually better than the original film.

And anyways, who says that creating sequels would automatically not be creative? There are some instances where sequels were actually pretty good, like Toy Story 2 and Toy Story 3, and actually were pretty creative as well (with Toy Story 2, for example, they actually did a very new plotline and an entertaining one, and actually gave an explanation for Woody's history). And anyways, you do realize the Harry Potter books were just a bunch of sequels yet they actually were pretty good, right?