Talk:Disney Princess/@comment-13112974-20150312234543/@comment-5342139-20150314232608

ending a division and ending a studio are completely different. the CEO handles whether the studio is gtonna end or not, not Lasseter.

so, you're now blaming him for merchandising. the toys department. you do remember that he makes films? not merchandise? merchandise is never part of his job. there's an entirely different studio responsible for that.

he never removed Winnie the Pooh from WDAS canon list? unless you're in Britain, Winnie the Pooh is part of the canon list in the US.

and may i ask, what IS wrong with CGI? are you those people that despise CG purely because they are? i have hopes that hand drawn will make a comeback, but not from Disney. why arent you blaming other studios of not making hand drawn films as well, while just blaming Disney?

yea, you would risk getting fired because YOU ARE NOT IN HIS SHOES AND DONT KNOW WHAT IT MEANS TO GET FIRED. and do you ACTUALLY think that executives would follow his wishes of destroying DisneyToon AND fire him? this is reality, and if that happens, he would get fired and nothing would be done. DisneyToon would still be there. "I'll start my own company if ne-" um, hellooooo? Pixar Animation Studios? created by lasster after he got fired? he went through the experience already thank you very much, and would like to not do that again.

and live up to WHAT promises exactly? what did he promise? He revived WDAS, made DisneyToon make quality films despite not doing well, end Disney sequels, continue with Pixar, worked on DisneyParks. what else do you want? OR do you want him to do what YOU think is best for the studio?

so, ok, Lasseter did not save WDAS? unless you hate CGI and love Home on the Range and Chicken Little, i dont see how that makes any absolute sense.

and now we're talking about Bob Iger? so you hate everything Iger and like Eisner better? OMG lol. during Iger, we saw Disney make more money and stock improve, Marvel films increase in quality, Pixar and Disney Animation make great films, theme parks increased in profits (even those like Paris and HK that lost money), Shanghai Disneyland, successfully entered the Chinese market, and basically improved everything Eisner. or are you gonna give me a long explanation of how Eisner revived Disney in the renaissance and somehow better than Iger when in fact Roy E. Disney himself kicked him out and let Iger join in? in fact, Iger is so good at what he's doing that Disney executives extend his reign to next year. how, in all the world, is he worse than Eisner?