Talk:Zootopia/@comment-5294119-20160328070545/@comment-27997791-20160329080040

Even if we ignore the discussion of to what degree it would be appropriate for kids to know about sex (I tend to think it's better to educate and teach kids to understand things rather than keeping them ignorant, perhapps especailly so when we're talking about sensetive matters, but anyway), you still haven't explained why Nick and Judy being an interspecies couple would make kids naughtier than any intraspecies couple would. Yeah, disease could potentially be worth considering, but that's a theoretical, technical problem, that's not what portraying romances in movies are about.

Are you implying that if a kid saw an anthropomorphic bunny kiss an anthropomorphic fox, they'll want to make out with their pet the next thing you know? I guess it could happen, kids are pretty silly, but kids do weird and inapropriate things all the time, I really don't see how that could make a big difference all things concidered.

Also, why do you seem to want to make the potential for cross-species afflictions into a main thrust of your argument? If you really think that this potential on-screen portrayal of a CGI anthropomorphic fox and bunny would cause kids to do inapropriate things to animals, then I feel as if you have bigger things to raise concern about than disease, shouldn't the primary concern then be the potential misstreatment of the animals?

Yes, this is getting pretty crazy, but you're the one who started this, I am merely trying to understand and scrutinize the arguments you're putting forward. You seem to be seeing dangers in this that I don't really think are there, so I feel that it is propper that I explain why I don't think it's as dangerous as you think, I can't really do that without getting somewhat specific.