Talk:Beauty and the Beast (2017 film)/@comment-27335535-20160508204916/@comment-1672596-20160523145554

They've already finished filming, so you may want to keep that $17 and use it elsewhere.

And quite frankly, if they go the route the original film did thanks to Linda Woolverton's left-wing feminism coming to the forefront, Belle's ugly on the inside and out during the first act even WITHOUT Emma Watson playing her. And unfortunately, I've heard Emma Watson's as bad as Woolverton regarding that area. For a film that was supposed to teach us that inner beauty is what is most important, the original film failed VERY badly in regards to Belle because many times she came across as no different than Gaston at various points.

I'm not too certain about the bit regarding sorcery, largely because, in my view, literally any elements that come from the violation of the natural order, even if such actions came directly from God himself, are exactly that. In other words, that basically means even God turning water into wine, regardless of whether he did create the world, is no different from a guy sacrificing a baby to molloch precisely BECAUSE it's unnatural and not of the natural realm. Besides, plenty of superheroes in DC and Marvel conducted various unnatural elements like firing heat vision from their eyes or most of the X-Men's antics, are we going to call them sorcerous?