Thread:Hey1234/@comment-5111231-20181028165946/@comment-1635429-20181104174634

SilverFlight wrote: It upsets me because we don't make separate real-life and fictional pages with others and for years, and in this way we've been avoiding page duplicates. It's worked without it, but for making duplicate pages for the same thing to happen affects the consistency of our article maintenance. I'm not expecting you to make a separate article; I'm trying to show you that separate articles aren't always needed as we don't even do that for the real-life articles with fictional information attached, but separating them makes it more confusing when we've never done that for past articles. The new stuff can still be transferred to the current OMD article as a tabber to avoid the problem of muddling up information. It also doesn't hurt to negotiate other ways of merging either and satisfy both ends. Although when you argue against that, none of your arguments have worked either because they're just as contradicting, and I feel like I'm repeating myself. Literally nothing I've said has been contradicting. You're saying we don't create seperate articles for fictional depictions, but we have. I'm bringing to your attention, once again, Hans Christian Andersen. How can you say we've never done it when I brought this up at the very beginning.

Your example, meanwhile, has been Haunted Mansion. An article that says next to nothing about its fictional depictions, besides a few trivia bullets and a sentence stating a movie was made. That's not the same thing at all.

And these aren't "duplicate articles" because they're not talking about the same thing. That's like calling Aladdin (film) and Aladdin (character) duplicate articles. It's also no different than saying the live-action and animated versions of Disney movies should be merged into one page and separated with tabbers. Again, this argument doesn't add up whatsoever.