Talk:Disney Revival/@comment-5342139-20141021203312/@comment-5342139-20141024012127

Bolt has as much of critical acclaim as Frog, so it's definitely a quality movie to the majority even if u don't think so.

also, Pocahontas and Mulan aren't popular characters as well. Their merchandise pales in comparison to others, their films were often overlooked. and Frog has the same issues.

Bolt made 310million dollars....completely overshadowing Frog. Combined with the fact that its critically acclaimed (whether u like it or not) should make it part of the Revival. But its not.

and about quality movies: Ichabod and Mr. Toad had critical acclaim and made decent money like Frog, but it never was part of the next era.

and as I said earlier, whether a film is good or not is preference. Bolt and Frog had the same critical success. meaning audience love both equally. There are people who dislike Frog, fyi.

Theres a reason why people call this the CG Revival Era. Little Mermaid started the era with first usage of CAPS. Tangled first used beautifully-rendered Painterly CG by Glen Keane. To me, Frog marked the end of the post-renaissance in a great way. After Frog, Disney changed its strategies with Tangled, changing its name, making it more action-packed, more modern, completely anti-Frog.

also the fact that none of the Frog songs really resonate audience. Tangled had Oscar-nominated I see the Lights and a famous villain song, Mother Knows Best. Frog had one good villain song, everything went lackluster. It simply isn't on par.