Thread:Hey1234/@comment-26864513-20151028125130/@comment-26864513-20151030232619

Hey1234 wrote: Disney has had finically successful non-musical films time and time again. It's nothing new, just because it outgrossed the others.

'''The fact that it was based on a comic book is nothing to deem "a turning point for the studio" either. It doesn't add any level of quality to the film, or the studio. It's just the source material. Nothing more than that.'''

The reason Big Hero 6 isn't pictured is the same reason Winnie the Pooh and Wreck-It Ralph aren't pictured. They were all successful (be it critically, financially, or both) but their results or impact weren't anything the studio hasn't seen before numerous times. That doesn't change the fact that they're great films, though. It's not that big of a deal. Yes, comic books are a deal. A comic book is a visual medium of storytelling. Traditional storybooks and original ideas are concieved through imagination. Comic books have visually established character with only one definitive interpretation of them. Disney Animation using new means of source material is a turning point. Why? because they are delving outside of their usual source material. That is innovation, that is a turning point. Failiure to understand this is ignorance.

PS: why the hideous image of Rapunzel? Alex2424121 was complaining about the same thing, and instead of understanding the wider picture, you for some reason decided to stick with a hideous image of one of Disney's most iconic princesses?