Talk:Disney Revival/@comment-5342139-20141021203312/@comment-5342139-20141023043733

1. Bringing back hand drawn doesn't mean it started it. The entire era consisted mostly of CG films, so its logical that Tangled, the first successful CG, to be the start.

2. Did u forget The Black Cauldron's Princess Eilonwy? If it was a famous movie, she would've been part of the DP lineup. 3. Oliver and Company and great mouse detective also regained interest into the studio and reused the animal formula that Disney kept using, despite very little. JUST like Princess and the Frog. All of those 3 are moderate successes and critically acclaimed. 4. Quality movie doesn't mean it a part of the era. Adventure of Ichabod and Mrm Toad was critically acclaimed, but its not part of the Cinderella era. 5. The eras are divided by BOTH critical and financial hits. Frog was not a hit. Tangled was. 6. Also, if u wanna compare popularity, Tangled is twice as popular. As popular as Ariel and Cinderella. Go to a Disney Store and y'all barely find any Tiana merchandize, but is littered with Rapunzel's. Tiana never had the same popularity as Ariel or Cinderella and probably never will.

Ps: I love Frog. But it doesn't deserve to be the start of Revival Era. Every dark ages of Disney always end with a good movie that doesn't have enough of a hit to be part of the renaissance. And Frog is one of them.