Talk:Disney Vault/@comment-25160330-20140804235232/@comment-3995035-20141017165233

Go to this link.

I explained why I don't see it being justified

As for Wreck it-Ralph, your comments also point to The Jungle Book, Aladdin, and ESPECIALLY 101 Dalmatinans.

I appologize if you didn't like it, but thats not the point, the Disney vault is a marketing tool that distributes Disney's financially successful/critically acclaimed/commercially exploited movies. Think of it like branchs of a tree, if one does horribly, or if the whole isn't strong enough, it's not put up or considered in the program.

Wreck it Ralph was indeed critically acclaimed, a box office hit, and the only movie in the revival era that's getting a sequel, just because it's not as heavily commercialized/not part of the usual Disney tropes does not mean it isn't successful (again, look at 101 Dalmatians).

I understand your frusteration, if it were up to me I would put Robin Hood in there and take Lion King and Frozen out. I never cared for either movies. Lion King is just Bambi with Fart Jokes and Frozen is an underwhelming first draft version of Akira (with the most boring Disney Princess (Elsa) to boot). But that's not the point.

If it REALLY means that much to you, you can go ahead and put it up, because I am sure it will be discused in a share holder meeting to see if it's a good investment, I doubt they will go through with it but if you really believe it has an equal chance, go ahead, I won't stop you. but I cannot promise anyone else will.