Talk:Claude Frollo/@comment-26200221-20150909152526/@comment-6032121-20160106170620

Whether he's the best villain is an open question, but he's not the most evil since he is not impervious to good feelings, just hardened by life. He's a neutral human being who turned horribly wrong in the last years of his life — a man who thought he was doing the right thing, at least at the beginning and with his persecutions of the Gypsies (he had lost part of his sanity by the time he was chasing Esmeralda and Quasimodo on the roofs of Notre-Dame in the climax). And, as destructive as said "things" may turn out, a villain who believes he's acting for good just can't be the most evil. The most evil villain would hate the very idea of good. Chernabog, for instance; he may not be the best villain, but he's one of the most evil. The Coachman from Pinocchio is also on the list of the "completely or almost completely evil", as is Maleficent. It doesn't necessarily make them better villains, but who said the best villain had to be the most evil ? It's a ridiculous concept to begin with.