Talk:Claude Frollo/@comment-24708279-20140711214544/@comment-1672596-20150131123700

Quite frankly, they really should have made him an explicit, knowing devil worshipper and explicitly an enemy of God merely posing as a churchman. That way, we actually wouldn't have any doubt about him being the most evil Disney Villain (well, okay, maybe he'll tie with Maleficent or come second place in that case. Not really a chance he can top someone who is explicitly the mistress of all evil, after all), not to mention he actually WOULD be as evil as humanly possible.

Final Fantasy and DC comics got it right with Kefka and the Joker, respectively, and Silicon Knights pulled off the corrupt churchman far better than Disney did with Frollo regarding Phillipe Augustine (or Pious Augustus I suppose). In fact, had it been me who made the film, I would have made SURE Frollo was almost exactly like Phillipe Augustine in characterization. All the above, BTW, actually demonstrated themselves to have absolutely zero remorse whatsoever for their actions (even Frollo had some remorse based on Hellfire and the fact that he even took in Quasimodo instead of killing him as he had originally planned), and thus actually deserved to be called Complete Monsters. If you're going to make the most evil villain possible, don't hold back.