Thread:Hey1234/@comment-39019997-20190407212233/@comment-39019997-20190410192716

That logic is not quite correct. Just because Demanitus's pupils are the ones who summoned Zhan Tiri does not mean that anyone who summoned Zhan Tiri was a pupil of Demanitus at one point. That would be like saying that, because some of my friend's dogs attacked me one time, therefore all dogs that have ever attacked me must belong to my friend (which is not true, since I have been attacked by other people's dogs as well.) I am not saying that I disagree with the idea that Sugarby and Matthews were pupils of Demanitus, on the contrary, I think it is clear from the silhouettes shown in Lost and Found. What I am saying is that it is logically inconsistent to say that Sugarby and Matthews were pupils of Demanitus when the only solid evidence we have is not enough to also say that Gothel was a pupil of Demanitus.