Thread:Bawi678/@comment-1672596-20180912123318/@comment-34367497-20180913201225

I had never stated that they didn't have a role in French Revolution. And I don't think that debating about whatever Enlightement philosophers were or weren't plotting has got much with the topic. And I doubt that basing historical KNOWLEDGE solely on Catholic websites is always the best idea. It's nothing bad in having untypical OPINIONS, but FACTS are neutral.

Well, I'm attending mass weekly (and these all holidays) too, and I know that. I meant, maybe in US it looks different, but in my country there isn't very much Bible in one's personal worship (I'm taking about ordinary believer, not clergry), compared to Protestants. And I had written that not every nun necessarily were literate, not that they weren't allowed to gain some educations - that means, I imagine there were monasteries somewhere in the villages where nuns were concentred mainly at working, and not all of them were able to read Bible themselvels. Monks' situation was perhaps better. And here's article about Marie Antoinette:

https://www.history.com/topics/france/marie-antoinette

Yes I know that, but I meant women hadn't got the same laws as men, or many laws at all.

Yes, but it didn't happen instantly. Like "Oh, a new epoque just started - we're all liberal and progressive". French Revolution happened at the end of XVIII-th century, and Belle's towns were somewhere in the middle of a province - new didn't came particulary fast. And about Jacobins, please don't insult my fauvorite princess. We don't know that. We don't know "what if". I believe that Disney world events were different than RL events. Besides, even if I'm totally disagreeing with someone, I try to respect him\her. And wasn't Rousseau a Catholic?

Maybe I will just ask my history teacher, OK?