Thread:GrayWolf2/@comment-5646665-20140504123557/@comment-5646665-20140504125838

You have made a logos argument and have backed your facts with previous actions, also using your stated position to do what is right. In someways you have used ethos, but on others you haven't. Your ethos reasoning is that everything must be pure fact and that what you do does not harm the pages. However is it ethical for you to go around all the pages to decide if your actions and beliefs should be used? How is it ethical that a site that allows all registered members access to pages to help improve them, when one person dominates everything. Pathos, you are hurting emotionally involved people who have loved these characters for a long time. They were interested in these powers and skills. If you believe you can come up with a new box for them to fill in, then I agree to that compromise, otherwise its seems entirely unfair.