Talk:Zootopia/@comment-27997791-20160319142742/@comment-27997791-20160319195752

Well, yeah you can, but why? Her actions really don't seem to make any sense to me, and I've argued for why that is. You seem to imply that it makes sense to you, and I'm not bellow being content with agreeing to disagree when people disagree, but I don't quite see how Judy's actions can be defended, it's clear that she could've done more to inform the right people, and it wouldn't even have needed to mess up the movie if she had.

Obviously, if she had informed th police or a hospital, the movie wouldn't quite work, becasue by that point there is now way Bellwether's plan would've succeded, so there'd be nothing at stake, drama-wise, and the movie would've had no climax. But I think that if the movie had been built up so that 1 - Bellwether had been strongly established as a good and trustworthy person who Judy trusted, and 2 - Judy had reason to suspect a second conspiracy and thus hesitated to tell the authorities and choose instead to tell someone she trusted, and told Bellwether, confident that Bellwether would make sure that the information was amde availiable to the right people if their own mission would fail.

That way Judy could've been justifiably confident that she was taking the right precausions before trying to uncover the plot, only to have it revealed in the end that Bellwether was the head of the conpiracy and would thus not be their backup the way she ahd counted on, meaning that her precaution, sensible as it was had been for nought, or may in fact even have been what allowed Bellwether to learn they where onto her. This could've worked dramatically and made Judy seem more thoughtful and responsible, allthough it would risk padding the run-time of the movie furhter.