Thread:Hey1234/@comment-5111231-20181028165946/@comment-5111231-20181030173026

I guess what I'm trying to get at that it sounds auxiliary to create a website article that already exists. And despite it being fictionalized, the site is still being depicted through a medium, which I don't see as any different from when Disney has a movie or medium that utilizes quasi-fictional Disney things, ex. the Haunted Mansion is an attraction not inherently created specifically for anything fictitious, and yet the page focuses on the ride while also mentioning its fictional depictions, details and all.

But it seems a consensus can't be reached.