All posts by Nighlocktheawesome

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Jpieper668 wrote: Walt Disney? </p> </i></div>
<p>No, Vincent Price. Of course I'm talking about Walt Disney.;) </p>

As do I.

Oh.

<div class="quote"><i> <p>AmericanButterfly wrote: no, Monstro is in "our" world since Pinocchio takes place in Italy and Sofia the First/Elena of Avalor, takes place in the Ever Realm.    </p><p>I mean it could be possible the ship he worked on sunk do to a sea monster but I doubt it was a gaint evil whale,  I think the most likely cause there was storm and a wave knocked over the boat, or at least Birk didn't make it, there might have been surviours that told Miranda what happend but Birk himself didn't make it.  </p> </i></div>
<p>Fair enough. Also, where did his name come from? Did it come from the fans and it just stuck? Or did it come from the creators? </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Andrewredmills wrote: I don't know, but I still think someone in the production team of "Lord of the Rink" tought Sofia was supposed to have a crush on Hugo, no matter what Craig Gerber says.  </p> </i></div>
<p>Eh, we'll just ignore Gerber. That's what I do with politics. I really don't care about debates involving politics, I don't care about debates involving Hillary and Trump, I just really don't care. </p>

<p>Possibly. Only one man could confirm that, and he's up in the sky with Legendary Stan Lee. </p>

Cool.

That was mostly my fault.

I was being sarcastic.

Cause every Disney movie needs a narrator apparently.

<p>It's possible, but it could have also been someone who tried to start a rebellion and was killed for it. </p>

Will characters from Descendants be in Kingdom Hearts 3?

<p>Will The Firebird, Spring Sprite, and The Elk appear? </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>MeggieConte wrote: Jelsa is as if Wonder Woman was in love with Batman. Not Bruce, just Batman. There's a REASON that Wonder Woman isn't in love with Batman! Because she's already in love with Clark Kent. And that would be REALLY messed up. </p> </i></div>
<p>It's already messed up, Clark's in love with Lois. </p>

I have nothing to say about this.

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Dereviewer wrote: Yeah, you're right. Even with the magic the Evil Queen has, there's no way she could turn the huntsman into a skeleton that quickly. Personally, I still think she could've killed both the First Queen and King. Snow White's mother did die in childbirth, but it's never specified what type of illness she contracted that caused her to become sick. Besides, Snow White obviously inherited her beauty and kindness from her mother, so maybe before the Evil Queen was the ruler of the kingdom, her magic mirror told her the First Queen was fairer than her, so that incited her initial jealousy and could've driven her to try to end the First Queen's life so she could replace her as the Queen. She could've disguised herself as a castle servant, given the First Queen some type of drink, which caused her to fall ill and pass away. And then, she married the King, and subsequently killed him as well. And she would think all her enemies were out of the way, until Snow White surpassed her beauty. </p> </i></div>
<p>The only one who could've turned Huntsman into a skeleton that quickly would be Chernabog. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>TheDragonDemon wrote: Last but not least. Disney Television: Sofia the First. this animation shows like the year 2000. its like from creators of My Friends Tigger and Pooh to me! these few Disney characters from originals and Original Princesses too! this shows for Kids! but on a few special episodes and finale! it is More than a Children Television! they're a lot of G's and PG-Rated of Disney Movies! they should put on Live Action and CGI Mix and Reimagine of Sofia the First (2037) into G Rated. </p> </i></div>
<p>It's gonna be a long time before Sofia hits the big screen. And joins the official lineup. Like we all believe she is destined to. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>FrostiesPrincess wrote: I am fine with remakes but recently Disney just made remakes for cashgrabs. There are a few good remakes such as Cinderella (2015), or at least as good as the original (ex: Beauty and the Beast 2017). But most of the time the remakes tends to falls flat and underwhelming, also lack of magic and charm vibes unlike the original ones, for some case the remake just ruin the original story and characters; ex. Maleficent (2014). </p><p>I also think Disney seems likely only cares to remaking popular movies, considering how large the fanbase of respective movies are. That's why the thing such as The Lion King (2019) was exist, considering how it wasn't actually a live action movie, just all of CGI landscapes and characters, it was actually works better as a super realistic animated movie. I despise the idea of remaking movies full of animals characters because we already know how they looks like. </p><p>I think it will be a good idea if Disney remade a lot of unpopular movies (ex: Black Cauldron, Atlantis, Treasure Planet etc.) instead of popular ones. I also hope they won't remake CGI animated movies in future (such as Pixar movies, Tangled, Frozen, etc.) couldn't be more ridiculous. </p><p>Overally, a lot of sequels, remakes and reboots just prove how Disney are currently out of ideas. </p> </i></div>
<p>
Hopefully they also remake Home on the Range. </p>

<div class="quote"><i> <p>Lord O' Darkness wrote: </p> <div class="quote">Cashmoney123 wrote:
I don’t think that’s such a good idea. CGI is so much better by a long shot. Would Zootopia look good in live action? No. Would The Fox and the Hound look good in Live action? No! Would Big Hero 6 look good in live action?! Probably. Point is. It’s never a good idea to remake something in real human eyes that’s just not meant for that kind of vision</i></div>
<p>Yeah, they should probably stick with 2D films, especially since that type of traditional animation no longer exists. This is why I think Pixar films would be a no-no since they're already CG. Trying to make them look realistic would be uncanny (like Detective Pikachu uncanny). Realistic bugs for A Bug's Life remake wouldn't do people who get squeamish at bugs any favors.  </p> </div> <p>You leave Detective Pikachu out of this. </p>

<p>I say that they should really use the remakes for the movies that didn't do so well all those years ago. Example: The Black Cauldron. We have new actors that make those movies better, such as the geniuses that are Benedict Cumberbatch and Andy Serkis. </p>