If you don't want me to get cross with you again, start editing smarter not harder. Do all your edits in one go and don't publish until you're absolutely sure you have finished. Better yet, use a sandbox to do your edits before publishing them onto the actual page.
Few of the logos you put up were not different at all and didn't have any. The only difference was audio alone, which does not suffice. I designed the new layout to display both pictures and description like with the Disney Junior and Wand ID pages. Only put up logos that are actually visually different. And I MEAN different.
I put up the edits you made in your sandbox because I was inserting the latest one for Maleficent: Mistress of Evil, which you accidentally removed, and I thought why not include yours at the same time.
Thank you for putting my edits there. That's alright. I plan to keep editing my logo sandbox. If the opportunity arises again in the future, feel free to add my edits in the main page again if you want.
I had not noticed yet that the pages Disney Junior and Wand ID had those lists of logos. OK, I understand.
Sorry for accidentally removing Maleficent: Mistress of Evil that time. I didn't mean to remove it.
OK, I'll remember to put only visually different logos there. I also removed those logos from my sandbox.
That said, I think the page should list sound variations. I find them interesting. In my opinion, the list looks incomplete without them. I wonder if that rule could be changed by discussion / consensus or something like Wikipedia does.
Anyway I'll do as you said. I'll use my sandbox to keep working on visually different logos.
I hope you're not uploading more just so you can create a separate gallery. I don't like how you're approaching this. Uploading more pictures to the point of them being too many is a bad a sign from my point of view. This is a Wiki, not a gallery site. Our top priority is information.
No, I think these are legitimate logos. I apologize if any of these logos aren't up to standard. I see you deleted a few logos I had uploaded. That's fine by me. I hope most logos can be kept.
I don't want to create any pointless galleries. I have no interest in uploading images just to have a gallery.
To be clear, I'm not particularly interested in either case, having or not having a gallery. Whatever location for these images is fine by me.
I think there are quite a few movies (and other media) with interesting logo variations that deserve to be shown and also described by text. I tried to upload only legitimate images, to the best of my knowledge.
In case you are interested, at that point when I created a separate gallery, I was already planning to upload a number of logos and expand the text (I already did both things since then).
I knew that adding text and images would make the page larger, so I preemptively added the gallery for that reason. In hindsight, I think my reasoning was a mistake. I probably shouldn't have created the gallery at that point.
I think you've done enough on that page. The problem is over editing, and I'm not lifting the block or letting you continue anytime soon. One user in particular got blocked for over editing sound effect pages. Furthermore your ongoing editing upsets the editing history of that page.
Doing nothing but image uploading leads to trouble. In time it becomes an obsession. You forget what you're supposed to be doing on a wiki. According to your history, uploading and edit galleries is all you've ever done. There is no record of you editing or expanding written contents. I don't like that at all.
Added "El Gayo José Francisco Alisandro de Lima y de la Loma Pancho Alegre" (full name found in an obscure comic) in the trivia section of Panchito Pistoles.
Various minor edits.
I get that my ongoing editing upsets the editing history of that page as you said. It's true, I apologize about this. I should have done all the changes first as a text page on my PC and then edited the wiki pages only once.
That said, there's another issue where I think we are not on the same page.
From what you say, apparently there's a problem with editing only galleries or sound effects. Personally, I don't see that problem. Maybe it's something that I don't get yet, and could understand in the future.
I see that the top priority is information, that seems perfectly true. Even if Disney Wiki somehow had no images, the information would still have great value.
To repeat, I did some work besides editing galleries (as shown above). But if someone appeared and said "Hey, I'd like to only edit galleries and do nothing else on Disney Wiki, would that be OK?" I'm not sure what would be the problem.
A few non gallery edits isn't good enough. You've one more gallery editing and a few non gallery edits makes no difference.
You're heavy gallery editing and less article editing makes you another Valyrian Wildfire and Jackson.carroll2.
The number of edits from a user on an article should be no more the 1 or 2 publishes, depending on the numbers errors. Instead you create a month of edits on one page, that it almost impossible to read other user's editing history. You should be editing it one go or using a sandbox before publishing.
I haven't been much active in the wiki. Overall I didn't do much text editing or gallery editing.
Still, I'm pretty sure I contributed more by editing text than galleries. (though I'm not sure how to compare exactly)
I listed some of my text edits because you had said that uploading and edit galleries is all I've ever done.
Walt Disney Pictures logo was the one time where I uploaded dozens of images, which were logo variations illustrating the text above.
Still, I think these logos were legitimate images. I didn't just upload them, I merged and edited practically the whole text of two pages about the logos in the process.
In my opinion, it's reasonable to have a gallery with one logo for each movie where visible variations exist, and I also think these logos deserve text descriptions in the list of movie variations. (some text descriptions are already in place, others may be added in the future)
How many times have I uploaded images before that? Usually I uploaded a few images to illustrate the articles I created above.
I don't know these users very well (Valyrian Wildfire and Jackson.carroll2). I see one of them was blocked for "Intimidating behaviour/harassment". Apparently that person has also been uploading fanart, which I know is against the rules.
I apologize again for my ongoing editing upsetting the edit history of that page as you said.
These are your words below. I understand and will follow this in the future:
"The number of edits from a user on an article should be no more the 1 or 2 publishes, depending on the numbers errors. Instead you create a month of edits on one page, that it almost impossible to read other user's editing history. You should be editing it one go or using a sandbox before publishing."
I've apologized (twice) and said I'll be complying about the editing history issue. That seems one big problem which I'd like to avoid. You are right about that.
When you tell me "You're still not getting the point." I assume you are talking about this point, because it was the last thing we talked about here.
I guess this discussion got a bit long because there were quite a lot of other points raised around here.
I think some of the points raised are misunderstandings, which I talked about above. Like when you said I've never edited or expanded written contents, or that I've done more gallery editing than text editing. Don't take this the wrong way, but I had a problem with those remarks. I think maybe you didn't pay much attention to my edit history at the time, because these points don't seem to actually apply to my work around here. So I've wanted to clarify that.
You don't seem to want to talk anymore, so I wish you the best. But feel free to reply and continue this conversation if you want.
I'll remember about not editing the same article so many times, like you said. Again, you are right.