Was can also mean it was planned, but never happened. There's been no indication, in years, that King of the Elves is still in the works. We can mark it down as a held off project, until Disney either confirms its cancellation or its release date.
"was" is still not a good choice of word. maybe just say King of the Elves is an upcoming project? upcoming doesnt mean any year, just in the future. or just delete it entirely until they confirm it (tho yes, that's way too much work).
then delete it entirely. we dont know if its existence is true or not. we dont know anything about it. nothing is revealed. meaning it could've been scapped for years. meaning its no longer Disney. then it should just be deleted entirely. the entire article, i mean.
DisneyJr, it has been two years and nothing has changed. In that time I have exhausted every resource I have to find any evidence to confirm the possibility of Anna and Elsa becoming part of the line-up and there has been nothing. As hard as it is for fans to accept, it is crystal clear that Anna and Elsa are never going to be part of the Disney Princess line-up. There is no point to keep on waiting.
and we also have no evidence to confirm whether they're not Disney Princesses. they put them in Disney princess labels in stores. if there's no evidence for both, then leave it until Moana comes and it'll be decided. but you're the admin, so it doesn't really matter, since it'll be resolved in the future anyway.
Anna and Elsa do have a connection to the DP franchise. However, they are not part of the line-up, like Jasmine and Rapunzel. Evidence is the DP website. Anna and Elsa are not listed alongside the others, but there's a link to the Frozen site. It's complicated, but Alex is right, we shouldn't list them down as official members, because they're not.
Yes, but the waiting is about to hit the two year mark. Tiana, Rapunzel, and Merida were added months after their films debut. Until Disney gives the word, we should just list them as guests. That's all they are, at this point.
As much as you want it to happen, it won't change a thing. I have searched really hard for two years in hopes of finding proof. Now I've come to an understanding that nothing has changed in that time and we have to face facts, its not going to happen. I've learnt to live with that and so should everyone else, otherwise there will be no end to this obsession.
Alex2424121 wrote: I know logic. The facts are clear and in front of us, and you are just trying to ignore them. I'm sorry 702085 but its the truth, and on Disney Wikia we show the truth no matter what.
OK! Fine! But just so you, I will remain optimistic. I am gonna wait until the sequel arrives and then see what happens. If the sequel doesn't make them Disney Princesses, I will give up
I'm sorry, but that isnt meant to be an insult. redundant means the info is repeated twice and that's uneccessary. the "previous-next" thing is already shown in the infobox in nearly every page, so there is no need for another one.
I write this message about your recent activity on the film Coco. For a start you don't create a duplicate page to apply the correct name, all you have to do is rename the original page's heading from "Untitled Pixar Movie About Dia de los Muertos" to "Coco (film)" which I have now done.
The titles maybe official but there quality is poor and I do not accept poor quality. Please do not proceed to revert them back otherwise it will turn into a matter that I will have no choice but to prevent from catching fire.
Well there shouldn't be, I only accept perfect high quality images which is one of my priorities to either remove or replace images that are of poor quality. I keep the wikia clean and tidy to be more professional looking.
Alex2424121 wrote: Well there shouldn't be, I only accept perfect high quality images which is one of my priorities to either remove or replace images that are of poor quality. I keep the wikia clean and tidy to be more professional looking.
then can you add the picture WITH the logo to an image section of each? so that people can see the logo, even if you don't want it next to the title?
I'm sorry I accidentally deleted that page, but I didnt know that and I acted rashly. But it would have been more polite if you told me that on my message wall instead of calling me an idiot in capital letters when you restored it. I also could restore the information if you just asked instead of having to rewrite it. I'm not trying to be superior or anything, but do remember that the main priority for users is communication and courtesy; not all situations are to be yelled at.
I was having a bad day and really stressed and I just fixed the page, but then it was deleted and I kinda panicked and freaked out. Please forgive me! I didn't remember that I could ask the admins to restore it and kinda exploded sorry sorry! D: