I wouldn't go right ahead assuming it's part of the Disney Peter Pan franchise yet. I also for now advise against linking this film with any of the articles related to that franchise.
Already I suspect this film is not part of the Disney Peter Pan franchise. If you have observed your findings you'll notice that the picture with the girl is wearing modern clothes and holding a flashlight instead of showing a Victorian era like in the franchise. This is clearly a stand alone film which has nothing to do with Disney's Peter Pan.
Right here: http://ignatz.brinkster.net/cimages/cbreathedsketch.jpg. According to Comic Strips / Take That - TV Tropes, there is a Take That related to Calvin and Hobbes, although not in the strip itself. For strips in Bloom County that parodied cartoon cats that featured characters such as Garfield and Hobbes, Bill Watterson retaliated hilariously with this comic. In response Berke Breathed said this:
"I have committed other thefts with a clean and unfettered conscience. Garfield was too calculated and too successful not to freely raid for illicit character cameos. Calvin and Hobbes was too good not to. Calvin creator Bill Watterson took these thefts in stride and retaliated in private with devastatingly effective illustrated salvos, hitting me in my most vulnerable places. Bill's sketch is an editorial comment on my addiction to the expensive sport of power boating and the moral compromises needed to fund it. That's me doing the kicking. The chap on the dock represents my cartoon syndicate boss, which says it all, methinks."
I while back I consulted with User:SilverFlight and User:Hey1234 about terminating the infobox sections "friends" and "enemy". I do not recall their opinions at that time, but Hey1234 has just recently got back to the subject and is up for it.
Here are the reasons why we should consider terminating "friends" and "enemies". It's becoming difficult to maintain with characters flip-flopping alliances, users adding characters as "friends" even though they've barely interacted, and not knowing where certain characters stand with each other in present day even though they were friends in the past (like King Louie and Kaa).
"Relatives", "Pets", and "Minions" are worth keeping because those are concrete. It would also be a good idea to have a "love interest" section so we can keep non-married love interests in the infoboxes.
Honestly, I feel like that could make sense as if it could be confusing for characters to be pals and enemies at the same time. I mean, it does feel like that mostly other users doesn't know the continuity of certain characters who switch sides from bad to good and vice versa. On the other hand, it could be not the most brightest idea on this wiki and would be even more confusing to delete the "friends" and "enemies" from infoboxes and might go a little too far as it would make users uncertain about who's their friends and enemies.
Now before you get into it I want to make something clear. Don't go rushing into creating new articles on some of these Fox films just because they are now under Disney ownership. You're just went ahead creating articles too quickly so you can add links or new categorizations. Disregarding the same treatment we have to the other film pages shows you don't plan to work on them more, nor are you interested in the topics you just wrote about.
If There are going to be articles on 20th Century Fox films it is going to be done properly. Don't create new articles unless you're going to put some real work into them.
Do you even know what the films you've written are about? Are you interested in them, have you looked them up or are you planning to see them?
You love of godamn elmo has made me leave the parody wiki because I can't stand you mocking me about how great he is when he isn't! He's a bad influence of holidays!!! You mock me about it!!! I WANT TO DESTORY IT!