Noting her birthday is forbidden on that page due to unreliable sources. The so called sources you claim are not reliable, not even google. Unless Kath Soucie herself confirms her birthday nobody is allowed to insert such information.
Alex2424121 wrote: Noting her birthday is forbidden on that page due to unreliable sources. The so called sources you claim are not reliable, not even google. Unless Kath Soucie herself confirms her birthday nobody is allowed to insert such information.
Um, what's a more likely possibility for us to be allowed to insert her birth date? Her confirming it, that's a million to 1 chance!
I just tried what you sugested and it's not an option. And the picture needs to focus on the character, not the full background, that why i'm changing back to the way was just a minute ago. It's still the picture that you like, it just focuses more on Skye.
Well, I just fixed that issue for you just now. I cropped the image myself to make it focous more on Sky and it looks perfect now and and replaced the previous one by clicking the button.Take a look. I know you'll be impressed.
Problem solved. Glad we could settle this before it got outta control and before it could turn to an edit war.
I've started rearranging the actors' roles into alphabetical order. This would make things a lot more organized on actor pages who have a lot of roles. This could also be something else for you to do on such pages if you wanted.
It has come to my attention that we need to encourage more editing into the Actor pages. Include more than just their film/show roles. They all lack any major contents which is why we delete them from the Wiki. We should try to expand them to include biography dating back to their early lives, leading up to their careers and to when they started working for Disney. There's more to actors than just acting. They have lives and history. Expand them to become more like their Wikipedia predecessors, but in our own words and research. Same goes for other pages on directors, animators, models, artists, musicians, the lot.
I share this with you, because you spend quite a lot of time on the actor pages and seem the right person for the job. This could be a new challenge to expand your experience. It will be a lot of work. Are you up to it?
I believe I am. It won’t be easy and the guidelines are a bit complex but nonetheless I’m willing to do whatever it takes to ensure those articles stay.
But with all respect wouldn’t putting their personal info sound too much like plagiarizing wiki no matter how much we rephrase it?
Greetings, Nate. I think there was a misunderstanding on the Paul Rudd page. If you look at my latest revision, I did provide the roles he is the most famous for. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the film Clueless is much more famous on social media than Monsters vs. Aliens, and so people would likely be more likely to recognize him from that film. I hope to restore my latest edit for the sake of clarity, and I apologize for the misunderstanding.
I disagree with that, we should not be focusing on his non-Disney roles. I think that there should only be what he's most famous for listed, if anything at all. Certainly Monsters v. Aliens and Sausage Party do not belong on there.
Actually they do. If he had so many other Disney contributions besides Ant-Man, then we wouldn't need all his other non-Disney related roles. But since he doesn't have much Disney-Contribution besides the MCU, we're keeping both his Clueless and his vocie roles in thoe animated films.
Please I don't wanna argue so let's settle this by including both Cluless and hte MvA & SP roles leave it at that. That way we both get what we want and can move on. That sounds reasonable enough to me. How bout you?
I don't want to argue either. We need to find other ways of expanding these pages than adding non-Disney info. Could we please compromise by, instead of edit warring about what non-Disney stuff should be there, discussing ways we can expand trivia about the actors as it pertains to Disney-related material. We can learn a lot about the actors and their process of filming these movies by watching their interviews, and I believe we should have insight like that. People don't come to a Disney wiki to look at what non-Disney stuff an actor was in, but people do come to the Wiki to find out more about the actor. I hope you consider.
Sorry for creating a second thread. We won't have to discuss this in-depth.
I understand. I would say that he's better known for other films than the ones that are currently listed. I think that "William Francis "Bill" Nighy is an English actor, voice actor, and comedian known for his distinctive rapsy voice." sums it up pretty well. I'll wait for something we can both agree on before making any changes.
Hello! Hope you're doing well. I see you undid my edits on the Tom Holland and Tom Hollander pages. I can understand why you may think they belong there, but my reason for removing them was that visually, they obstructed the content on the page. Also, their names are only vaguely similar. The only way one would end up on the Tom Hollander page is if they clicked it specifically from the search bar, or if they clicked on it from a Pirates of the Caribbean-related page. There's not much room for confusion between the two.
Hopefully you'll be alright with me undoing your edit. Thank you, and again I hope your day is well.
It's called disambiguation and it's quite useful to include. A lot of people get these two confused. Like Bill Nye and Bill Nighy, Bill Cosby vs Bill Cobbs, Paul Rudd vs. Paul Rugg. It helps us avoid confusion
I understand. Perhaps there's a compromise to be made here? I don't personally believe the distinction is necessary content for the page, but I'm willing to keep it there if you'll allow me to change the format. I checked Wikipedia and noticed that the disambiguation is there also. It looks better on that page than it does here, in large part due to the difference between the formatting of Wikipedia's interface versus our own.
Would you be alright with me editing the format so that it looks a little better and doesn't obstruct the content so much?
How does this look? It's an official disambiguation template. We may need to create a new one for the purposes of similarly-named actors, though. By linking to Spider-Man, it automatically classes the page as a "Marvel Comics" article in the categories section, which it certainly is not.
I agree with that about phrasing. Unfortunately the template I found has preset text, so it reads "This article is about ____, for ____, see ____." I'll see if I can't figure out how to create a new template that just reads "Not to be confused with".
Awesome! I look forward to working together with you in the future. :) It's been really great meeting you.
Well, actually, there is a solution for the "not to be confused phrase." You just go to source mode type :Not to be confused with__" It's not exactly a template, but it's close enough.
Look at the the Paul Rugg article and view it in source mode and you'll see what I mean.
In any case, good luck with creating that new template.
I don't think the Bill Nighy page is at risk of being deleted. My goal is to leave pages with exclusively Disney-related content, and in Mr. Nighy's case, there's enough there that I don't think it would be deleted. I think that the page is vital enough that it wouldn't be deleted under any circumstances.
On an unrelated note, do you use the Disney Wiki discord, or the chat function? I think it would be cool to discuss what we both want for the Wiki. I have a few things I'd like to say that would be best to discuss privately.