Hello, we were recently made aware that you've been reverting edits on Tony Anselmo's page. As stated on your message wall, we had been contacted to use their preferred name, which should be honored. Please refrain from reverting edits on Tony's page.
—TIMESHADE |Talk/Wall| - |C| 05:17, September 17, 2020 (UTC)
To be fair, That’s why we have the perferred name in quotes. All our actor pages have their full name with nickname typed out with their nickname in quotes. Anthony Franklin “Tony” Anselmo. That’s how we always do it. Please keep it like that.
Fandom was contacted several times about this, and we were directly asked to remove it. Personalities have the right to control the use of their name, image, etc. You can read this article if you want to know more about it. So I'm gonna remove it again, because we have to, please do not revert my edit. Thanks.
Actually The way I see it those guidelines only apply to the actual Wikipedia not necessarily this wiki.
Besides we have billions of actors with their nicknames in quotes so removing that format is a waste of time.
So that said please keep Anthony Frank “Tony” Anselmo the way it is. Because that’s how it should be since we’ve used this format since forever. Nothing wrong with that. Please leave the full name alone.
No, it doesn't only apply to Wikipedia, it applies to everyone. We are legally required to remove it, and if you revert my edit again, I will have no other choice than blocking you. And I would really like to avoid this, so please do not revert my edit. In this particular case, we were asked to remove it, it does not necessarily mean that we have to do the same for all pages. Some personalities don't mind, some do.
What’s the difference exactly? Why are some pages required to remove full names and some aren’t? Because no offense but that is the stupidest thing I ever heard! It just makes no sense!
I would genuinely appreciate it if you left Anselmo’s page alone. All celebrities have their birth names and preferred names in their articles and it would be most logical if you left Tony’s page the way all other pages are. And please don’t block me for sticking to what I believe in.
Please do me a favor and concede to to leave his given and nicknames alone.. because I am not backing down from this. I know what’s best for pages when I see it.
So for the last time please leave Tony’s page alone? It would mean the world to me if you kept the page like all others.
The difference is that we were directly asked to remove it for this specific personality, not for the other ones, so we have to do it, to comply with the law. We told you several times already. So I'm gonna remove it, and it's my final warning.
Well we should put his full name because it’s a true genuine fact. And we want all facts on this wiki. Absolutely no facts left out.
In any case I think I have an idea of how to settle this. Could we at least leave his full name in the info box? If we don’t, the way I see it we’re putting false info given Tony is not his birth name. After all, We want all facts. Facts are extremely important to this wiki and We don’t want any facts removed.
No, sorry but we can't. He doesn't want this name to appear at all, and he has the right to control the use of his name, as explained above. You have to understand it is not my decision, we don't have a choice here, it's the law. if we don't comply we could have legal issues, and so do you.
With all respect I fail to see how that wiki "law" makes sense exactly,
Putting the name "Tony Anselmo" in both the intro paragraph and the infobox is a bit too redundant. We don't want any redundancies. So either put his full name in the infobox or leave it out of the infobox entierely.
It's written on the page. If, after no less than seven days from the nomination, the voting is unanimous and the nominee has accepted, then a bureaucrat will grant the user administrator privileges. If no consensus has been reached within fourteen days, the nomination is rejected.
Noting her birthday is forbidden on that page due to unreliable sources. The so called sources you claim are not reliable, not even google. Unless Kath Soucie herself confirms her birthday nobody is allowed to insert such information.
Alex2424121 wrote: Noting her birthday is forbidden on that page due to unreliable sources. The so called sources you claim are not reliable, not even google. Unless Kath Soucie herself confirms her birthday nobody is allowed to insert such information.
Um, what's a more likely possibility for us to be allowed to insert her birth date? Her confirming it, that's a million to 1 chance!
I just tried what you sugested and it's not an option. And the picture needs to focus on the character, not the full background, that why i'm changing back to the way was just a minute ago. It's still the picture that you like, it just focuses more on Skye.
Well, I just fixed that issue for you just now. I cropped the image myself to make it focous more on Sky and it looks perfect now and and replaced the previous one by clicking the button.Take a look. I know you'll be impressed.
Problem solved. Glad we could settle this before it got outta control and before it could turn to an edit war.
I've started rearranging the actors' roles into alphabetical order. This would make things a lot more organized on actor pages who have a lot of roles. This could also be something else for you to do on such pages if you wanted.
It has come to my attention that we need to encourage more editing into the Actor pages. Include more than just their film/show roles. They all lack any major contents which is why we delete them from the Wiki. We should try to expand them to include biography dating back to their early lives, leading up to their careers and to when they started working for Disney. There's more to actors than just acting. They have lives and history. Expand them to become more like their Wikipedia predecessors, but in our own words and research. Same goes for other pages on directors, animators, models, artists, musicians, the lot.
I share this with you, because you spend quite a lot of time on the actor pages and seem the right person for the job. This could be a new challenge to expand your experience. It will be a lot of work. Are you up to it?
I believe I am. It won’t be easy and the guidelines are a bit complex but nonetheless I’m willing to do whatever it takes to ensure those articles stay.
But with all respect wouldn’t putting their personal info sound too much like plagiarizing wiki no matter how much we rephrase it?