Freddie Prinze Jr., for example, only worked on Star Wars Rebels, so he only gets the Star Wars Rebels category. The admins and myself made this clear years ago, which made organising stars wars categories a lot better. Anyway, categories, such as Star Wars Rebels, Sequel Trilogy and so on are categorised with Star Wars.
Do you understand the logic behind this method? In my opinion the Star Wars categorization is far more tidier than marvels. They're all a mess of different categories, relevant, irrelevant, true or false. I would tidy those up as well, but Marvel isn't my strongest suit.
Ok I'll be honest, you've left me totally baffled right there. I fail to see how that makes the slightest bit of logical sense. I thought all things SW related includes that category.
I mean, how come you allow everything Marvel subsdiary-related to include the Marvel category?
But whatever the case, I'll just take your word for it and will leave the whole SW to the professionals from now on. I may be still totally confused, but I'll just go with it.
You spent most of your time around Marvel topics than you do with Star Wars. It's all about being tidy and organised. Since you've brought this to my attention I will be consulting with the Admins to give Marvel the same treatment.
I'm sorry, but the truth is I'm not really into SW, Marvel, or anything else non-Disney much. So I don't think I'd be able to help you with such a matter. Plus, among other things, I wouldn't even know where to start.
Here's my advice. You could ask another user or admin who are a real humongous fanatics of SW/Marvel to help you out with this. I'll just stick to contributing while following the rules on the wiki as usual.
Besides, you can always create a blog post as a way of sending a message to everyone on the wiki about this sending a list of Marvel category names.
Whatever the case, I will allow you to do whatever you intend to do to keep the wiki tidy and organized--regardless of if I agree with some actions or not.
Look, I wish I could help you but I can't. Sorry but I dont' have the ability to unblock people. I'm not an admin.
Well, here's my advice try contacting the community fandom and try to request a block lift. Read this and it'll give you some inspiration on it. Just have a mature conversation with the user who blocked you for your block to be lifted or at least reduced. Just tell the guy how you understand whatever you did was wrong and how you're gonna change. Find out more on this blog. https://community.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Sannse/How_to_Get_Unblocked
Plagarism? I am sorry. THat was most definitely NOT my intention! I absolutely never meant to do such a thing. Honestly, I am totally against that.
May I explain myself?
To be honest, I just needed those summaries filled and they were days past the airing of the episode and I'm not very good with writing episode summaries on my own. So, here's what I did. I simply revised the DT episodes in my own words (a few grammar and sentence revisions and spelling corrections) to ensure it won't be plagarism before publishing. So, if it's not completely the same text as the other wiki, then it's not plagarism if I recall correctly.
Whatever the case I promise to make sure summaries are not completely the same as the other wikis. After all, contributing on this wiki is one of my favorite hobbies.
But I've seen all the summaries, especially with the newest ones and your differences appear to be as minimum as playing spot the difference. You really can't blame me for being mad about this, because many of these summaries are also my own work (if you wanna know which, check out my profile on the Ducktales wiki). That being said, when I see it on another wiki and not to mention you never even said you got most of it from the Duckales wiki in the editing section, some people can get the vibe that it was you who wrote the entire summaries.
Gman213 wrote: But I've seen all the summaries, especially with the newest ones and your differences appear to be as minimum as playing spot the difference. You really can't blame me for being mad about this, because many of these summaries are also my own work (if you wanna know which, check out my profile on the Ducktales wiki). That being said, when I see it on another wiki and not to mention you never even said you got most of it from the Duckales wiki in the editing section, some people can get the vibe that it was you who wrote the entire summaries.
And I don't blame you for getting upset but I think I see your basic point. "Without mentioning DT wiki, some people get vibes that I wrote the summary on my own." I most certainly do not want to get any unfortunate implications that are beyond my actual goal. In fact, some reuslts could even get rather ugly to say the least. I hate to imagine.
So bottom line, your basic point is make sure my edits don't reuslt in any other unfortuante implications, is that accurate?
How can I ensure those bad implications won't happen again? What's your advice?
In any case, I will be much more caerful with my edits I promise you that.
Well I mean the best advice I can give is to make your own summaries, or at least encourage others on your wiki to help out with the summaries. Back in the second half of season 1, our wiki had no one doing them, but now we have at least 4 people (including myself) who are willing to write em the moment the episode's released because we became consistent with it. But if push comes to shove, if you can't find anyone for the job, find out who on our wiki wrote the summaries and at least ask em for permission to place it elsewhere.
Have I ever told you that I hate it when users message on messages that have nothing to do with them? That message to Vulchal was advise on how to stop people from FALSELY RENAMING articles and CREATING articles that don't belong here. It had absolutely nothing to do with you or the people articles. The names will never be blocked unless it's necessary. You still don't seem to fully understand why articles lacking contents is unacceptable because you're too blinded by the facts that whatever it is, is involved with Disney, regardless of how little its involvement is.
If you reply, I don't want to hear any excuses over why we shouldn't delete them because I'm not interested. Users who invade other user's messaging get on my nerves, and I want assurance that it won't happen again.
Users who keep restoring discarded edits also makes me cranky, and users who don't pay attention to instructions on what they can and can't do. What really makes me cranky is users abusing multiple accounts, which I have been monitoring a lot more than the Admins have. All this is enough to give a guy stress, because he's constantly keeping the Wiki safe and fair for everyone.
If you were in my shoes all this would get on your nerves as well. You wouldn't be telling anyone is harsh and mean because you be no better.
Stop adding in the Raya and the Last Dragon category on the Alan Tudyk article. Just because he has been the staple of all the more recent Disney animated films in the "revival era" doesn't mean you add in the specific category.
Unless if Disney or Alan himself confirmed he's involved in Raya we don't add it in the category.
Well, what site would be a reliable source?
Why ask? The majority of the website articles of Raya NEVER mentioned about Alan Tudyk being involved in the film, yet, cause the ONLY actors they announced at D23 were Cassie Steele and Awkwafina. In fact Alan was oly at D23 cause he is set to star in the Cassian Andor spinoff for Disney+.
Like I said, unless if Disney or Alan himself confirmed he's involved in Raya we don't add it in the category.
There are other sites than just Kimcartoon. You just know where to look. I know 18 online video sites. Videos of good or poor quality, and some downloadable. 4 of them, including Kimcartoon, which have Elena of Avalor.
Alex2424121 wrote: Online Watch Cartoon is much better than Kimcartoon sometimes, and I use YouTube to find better quality. You'll otfen find episode clips or the whole episode cut into parts. The quality is good.
I think see what you mean. Sometimes the cartoon site's quality is decent, sometimes it isn't. The sites aren't
In any case, i got the new improved images from Youtube and they are pretty decent looking to me.