If you're going to conflict with me every time I delete images I will report you for revert warring. Do you understand me? Fake renders are not permitted on this wiki. We put an end to that ages ago due to confusion. Some were taken from screenshots and mistaken for actual renders. As of now we only permit official ones. No fake/fan made images unless its just for your personal profile.
So, let's talk to that to King_Phelous. He keeps stubbornly removing the Shrunk category from Josh Gad's page forcing me to readd it. Let's just tell him not to jump to conclusions so quickly, before this turns into an edit war.
Dude I know I know I was trying to help you solve the sockpuppeting problems but every time I tried but I ended up making things worse and I’m sorry for you getting blocked at Heroism Wiki I didn’t mean it and I just wanted to help.
If it was just me doing the galleries of the last Tangled episodes I would only put up images that are worth putting up. I wouldn't try to capture every scene, and I don't bother with scenes of it just being hands, feet, and anything else pointless. I also try to be more concern about the amount, and know when to tell myself no when tempted to add more.
Like I've said a thousand times to everyone this is not a gallery site. Our top priority is information. If you want to look up pictures you can watch the episode again or look them up on google. You don't always need to put up whatever you find somewhere else onto here.
I also insert images I believe are worth adding. Like the images that show important quotes and events. Like finding the moonstone shard and quoting stuff like Cass breaking down in genuine remorse. Also you don't always have to see a character's face for it to qualify in the gallery.
Whatever the case, if it's any consolation to you, I will try to lay off the photos a bit. and do other kinds of edits instead even though I'll never understand your complex rule about photo limits.
Alex2424121 wrote: Will you stop revert back my deletions!
WIth all respect, I believe you're the one who's doing the reverting. It says so on the page history. I'm just doing harmless updating to the article. Please I really do not like it when you remove random images from galleries. Nobody likes it when you do that.
Can we at least please compromise? Mabye create a gallery section?
Well, I'm sorry but I cannot promise you I won't insert images again.. A lot of those images are extreemly important and vital.
Really, I try and I try to understand your prefrences on images but I'm just left more baffled! They don't really make the least bit of sense.
And honestly, I've lost my patience with you and trying to understand your puzzling, exasperating views. I try very hard to be polite, and you respond to me in anger and harshness.
So, please don't take this the wrong way, but your image guidelines are impossible for us users to comprehend let alone follow.
Sasha Querr: Sockpuppet who constantly uploaded duplicate images and made unnecessary removals and adjustments to galleries relating to The Little Mermaid. Specifically the Melody and Ariel screenshots from The Little Mermaid II. Also deliberately removed the entire Screenshot section of the Melody galley.
Two users I can't remember by name: One constantly uploaded non-Disney related photos to celebrity pages while the other put up costume photos of Alice. Both left their images with gibberish headings.
Savannahbug23: Tried to replace over Frozen screenshots when it was totally unnecessary.
MurphyWiki: Spammed screenshots relating to Doc McStuffins and Palace Pets. All were spams and gibberishly named. Refused to listen to my advice.
All of them were more interested in image uploading than writing. They all got to a point where they got carried away. I constantly and patiently advised them all to give themselves boundaries, quoted the rules, and reminded them of the changes over the years. I explained everything, and every single one of them disappointed me. Some were unreasonable or completely oblivious of what they were doing wrong, despite all the explanations. None of them would listen or set boundaries.
However, there have been some like Lola987. When she first started she would uploaded far too many images of OUAT, leaving them gibberishly named and added to literally to every respective gallery. Some of those images were hardly focused on the character in question, especially ones that are character groups. Her large amount caused clutter and upsetted the scrolling pace until I stepped in to advice boundaries. I said to her "Be smart with your edits not random. Once you've figured that out you will accomplish anything." and she did. Now she is more selective about her uploads. She has boundaries and she has my full trust and support to upload without me constantly advising her.
You can do the same. Your uploading is still worth something if its turned in the right direction.
You think your uploading is in the right direction. That's what the other users thought, and you can tell what happened to them. They all thought they weren't doing any harm but they were wrong. Their problems were not setting boundaries or being smart. I tried to help Savannahbug23 and when she failed to cooperate I had her blocked for good. But then I gave her another chance and this time she made an effort. For a while she only replaced over images that needed to be replaced. But then, for some reason, she caused problems once again resulting her getting banned for good by Hey1234.
MurphyWiki was even more frustrating to handle. No matter how many chances I gave her she would not cooperate. So I had no choice but to ban her from editing the McStuffins and Royal Pet galleries. If she couldn't do as she was told then she couldn't upload anything at all.
I've been supervising users about image uploading and many other things long before you joined. Some were cooperative and some ended up either leaving or blocked. I don't wish to include you to that list when I stumble upon another user who is doing the same thing.
"Be smart with your edits not random. Once you've figured that out you will accomplish anything." I'll definitely take that in consideration.
But, blocking those users who had trouble understanding your limitations? That sounds a bit harsh.
I honestly mean no harm and this is one of my favorite sites to edit. It's just hard to tell whenever you get carried away or not. And sometimes when particular images are removed, that causes a few unfortunate problems.
I might never fully properly understand your increasingly complicated settings on galleries. No matter how hard I try I just can’t seem to get it and it only leaves me more frustrated and baffled. It's just increasingly complicated. But I suppose I'll just move on either way.
Guess it's just everybody has their own unique way of editing.
What do you mean both Joanna the Goanna and Slim's nephews aren't in Once Upon a Halloween? There are some clips of them from both The Rescuers Down Under and Home on the Range being featured, which proves that they are among the Disney villains to conquer Halloween.
I also knew that IAmMaxB removed Once Upon a Halloween from some infomation about some villains 'cause he thought it was false, but it's not, and he also thought Once Upon a Halloween doesn't exist, but it does
Lately, I've been editing around pages related to Atlantis: The Lost Empire, and I've noticed a few things that are in need of re-evaluation. Mostly all the pages relating to the film are filled with contents that sounds like speculation, fan-fiction and nonsense.
When I read through the Atlantis page it says that after its discovery it became a secret tourist attraction for celebrities, and dignitaries. According to the Heart of Atlantis page, the crystal originated from a comet, which passed over Earth 10,000 years ago. We even have a page on Keepers of the Journal. I've watched the film and behind the scenes documentaries. There was no saying Atlantis became a tourist attraction, no origin of the crystal and no Keepers of the Journal.
From what I can tell, all this information was plagiarised from the Atlantis Wiki, which is seemed to be more fan based than accurate. I think its time we gave Atlantis: The Lost Empire a major re-evaluation. Remove any information that is considered false as well reorganise and simplify the contents till they are more like the rest of the pages on this wiki.
I'll be notifying other admins, content mods, and other good users to help out.
Hmm. Maybe we should. Maybe we shouldn't I'm kinda in a muddle here. I have no idea. I'm not exactly an expert on these things.
Whatever the case, I don't think it's for me to decide. May I suggest you consult your question for admins and/or moderators like GrayWolf2 ? He might be more help to you and eh's more of an expert on that stuff.