FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Remember actor John de Lancie?

      Loading editor
  • This is the first and so far the only film in the series where Perry the Platypus talks; his speaking voice is provided by action star Bruce Willis.

    06064f327c94527035722ed434844cdd

    Agent_P

    Bruce Willis by Gage Skidmore

    Bruce_Willis.pgo

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Pardon me, it was you who edited in a "SJW" way the page I made about the Indians of Peter Pan?

      Loading editor
    • View all 8 replies
    • You are allowed to include that on the page if it comes from an authentic source and you link to the source. Please do not remove other factual content from the page. Thank you.

        Loading editor
    • I still ask for the user in question to be banned or at least blocked indefinetely before does other damages! SJWs are not welcome here! They're not real fans or experts! I have had too many bad esperiences with them! Directly and indirectly! Verbally but also physically! They shouldn't be here! They're eternal Disney-haters and sworn enemies, radicals, slanderers, defamators, detractors and revisionists pro-censorship without any sense of context and respect for the fans, followers, experts and historians! This person has also written on the page that Marc Davis was a white man and for that "racist" and "misogynist", it's an unacceptable behaviour, must be banned, too dangerous!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • We have different stub notices for specific pages. Films, episodes, characters, books, locations, objects, songs and video games.

    {{FilmStub}}
    {{EpisodeStub}}
    {{CharacterStub}}
    {{BookStub}}
    {{LocationStub}}
    {{ObjectStub}}
    {{SongStub}}
    {{VideogameStub}}
    
      Loading editor
  • Curse Dragon deserves to appear at Disney Villains or not.

      Loading editor
  • I'm giving you another chance but if you do this and cause revert wars again I'm banning you again. Understand?  

      Loading editor
  • Don't bother inserting stub notices to the people pages. We've never bothered inserting them to the people pages for years. Even with no notices we still get some work done on them.

      Loading editor
    • Anyway there are 4741 people pages. It will take you forever and you can't do them all. It's better to just leave the stub notices and proceed with what you've set out to do.

        Loading editor
    • With all due respect, shouldn't the stubs be marked so that people know the pages need to be expanded upon and are lacking information?

        Loading editor
    • We've never bothered providing them to people pages for years since they never received any major attention like the character pages. You're be better off just doing what you set yourself out to do. If you're going to expand those pages then get on with it. They won't expand on their own, and if users want to expand them they'll do it on their own terms.

      By the time you read this I've gone to bed.

        Loading editor
    • This isn't "logic looping". I still stand by my earlier statment that the only way people will know a page isn't up to wiki standards is by placing a tag on it. I've been trying to expand the pages, but you have been removing any progress on the articles by deleting them, then you tell us to work from scratch to expand them or reverting the edits.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Neel Sethi is still a stub, so until you actually put in some extensive work I recommend using sandboxes before publishing. They are personal pages where you can experiment and have time to work on the page without worrying about any deletions or changes while editing. Move the contents of Neel Sethi to your sandbox.

      Loading editor
    • Are you just going to ignore me now? I have given you an alternative to this matter, and I'll be happy to reconsider my deletion when you've made some progress which is better done in sandboxes. They are very useful and you can make as many of them and reuse them anyway you like.

      Please reply.

        Loading editor
    • I added what I was editing when the page was deleted to the sandbox. It's still incomplete, but it's much better than it was before.

        Loading editor
    • Would you be willing to restore the Neel Sethi page, please.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Understand that I'm not a bad person once you get to know me. You have a lot of enthusiasm and potential that could be worth something if turned in the right direction. Like I said before you've got a long away to go before you understand how things are done here. You will find there are things you can and can't do, and because of your absence you're obviously going to disagreeable on some things. Example, you didn't know that its usually my department to consult on theme designs and you are unaware that the Wiki decided not to include Simpson topics.

    I don't blame you for not knowing because you have an excuse, but I'm willing to give you a chance and guide you through over what you can and can't do. Given time you may earn my trust.

      Loading editor
    • I've been thinking over your proposal about deleting episode pages. I'm not saying I agree or disagree, but I will take it into consideration. We must give the community a chance to salvage these episode pages which has been made possible. Encourage users and fans to expand the episode pages. They don't have to expand them all just as many as they can. Mostly encourage them to expand the ones they like. I will also be having a word with a few certain users who create episode pages but never shows any intention to keep on editing them.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Please leave the Disney logo as it is. Your design is better suited for the Mickey Mouse series wiki and does not match with the current theme design of this wiki and we're not going to change it anytime soon. Furthermore we're sticking with Mickey's original traditional iconic Sorcerer look, not the TV series look.

      Loading editor
    • View all 8 replies
    • With great respect you lack any knowledge of how the Disney Wiki runs. Your profile history reads that you were only here for a few weeks before you disappeared for four years and now you've shown up again. I can only assume you're here because of self-isolation like the rest of the world right now. So far, I find no record of you being on other Wiki. I'm sorry, but you've got a long way to go before you can consult big decisions or working together.

      It's not just about following the rules or who are the Admins. At the end of the day experience and getting to know people matters. Loyalty, respect and trust also has to be earned.

        Loading editor
    • Believe it or not when I tell you the truth. Everything I have said to you is the truth based on my long active time and experience here. All theme design has been consulted with me. It's been that way for years and the Admins don't mind leaving it to me. Even standard users or wiki managers who have ideas are always referred to Me. Unfortunately due to your long absence you're completely unaware of all this making it impossible for you to understand.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+