FANDOM

Weedle McHairybug

aka Eric Otness

  • I live in Dunwoody, Georgia
  • I was born on February 14
  • I am Male
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hi there Weedle. I am working on my own Mr. Peabody and Sherman comic book sequel and I inserted Mr. Peabody and Sherman meeting Hans Christian Andersen and helpung him get inspiration on writing The Little Mermaid. I thought I might tell you since you seem to praise The Little Mermaid alot. Of course, it’s definetly inaccurate since that part of the comic is in the style of the old Improbable History cartoons, but still. I acknowledged The Little Mermaid in a project of mine.

      Loading editor
    • Okay, good luck on that. However, I have high praise for the Disney version. The original, let's just say I don't have particularly high praise for that one, and leave it at that (ironically enough, my issues with the original are pretty much the same things that people criticized the Disney version).

        Loading editor
    • Ah well, it's like my mom always says "No one can tell you what to like."

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Shan Yu's defeat in Kingdom Hearts 2 does not count as "Falling To Their Death" he was defeated infront of the palace gates where he just collapses and falls onto the floor infront of Sora and Co. He didn't fall off the palace roof or a cliff or any sort of large height for this to count. They didn't even specify if he died and could have just been arrested.

    Also his death in the Manga does not count either because him falling off the palace roof was obviously not what killed him. Xigbar did the part that killed him.

      Loading editor
  • Weedle you need to stop this. Despite your good intentions, your constant insistence that you're right leads you into trouble and annoying the community. Have you learnt nothing from all the complains and bans you kept getting? I will not have any editing conflicts on the pages. I don't want to hear any arguments or anything to defend your speculations. The information stays where it is, though I should consider most of it to be erased because is sounds like speculation. Speculated by you.

    I'm only going to say this once. No more conflict or speculation.

      Loading editor
    • If it's shown in the film, OR expanded universe, it's present and thus an actual fact. Period. No exceptions. And I'm not "speculating" anything, since all of that is shown in the films and/or expanded universes. If I added in a statement claiming that, say, Ariel could fly or use the Kamehameha or anything like that, despite literally showing no capability of such in the films, comics, video games or ANYTHING of the sort, only then can you actually say I'm speculating in an article and remove it as the rules request.

      Besides, Ariel's article is FAR from the only instance of this occurring regarding abilities. It's also prevalent on Gaston's article, Belle's article, Beast's article, heck, Shan Yu's article as well (and with the exception of a couple of edits there, most of those stuff on Shan Yu's article were done by other users, NOT by me, certainly not the superhuman strength bit). Even Quasimodo's article has a degree of this with the reference to him having "abnormal strength", and I never even edited that article.

      And just as an FYI, I'd be perfectly content otherwise to just leave it alone. The problem, however, is that Ursula transformed Ariel while the latter was still deep underwater (in fact, based on the volcanic vents, probably close to the abyssopelagic layer). Any human that's caught down there would certainly end up like a praya creature hen exposed to the mesopelagic layer (ie, they'd explode due to oceanic pressure differences), and considering Ariel remained intact and ONLY needed to worry about getting oxygen instead of, say, her body breaking apart, that leaves any possibility of superhuman endurance being removed far too ambiguous to even claim she no longer possessed it upon becoming human. Even if I personally wanted Ariel to NOT retain her superhuman abilities, I'd still retain it precisely BECAUSE the film made clear she did via the visuals. I mean, what, should we claim Albert Wesker having superhuman speed and superhuman strength is "speculation" despite it being visually shown just because those terms aren't explicitly used in Resident Evil? Because that's what it's sounding like.

        Loading editor
    • And have you not learnt I don't read your long messages anymore. It is all speculation, PERIOD, and you're too stubborn as usual to admit when your wrong. If you don't keep yourself in check I will report you next time.

        Loading editor
    • Just for the record, I'm actually capable of admitting when I'm wrong. In fact, this edit here is a GOOD example of me admitting I was wrong regarding an edit I previously made and making sure to correct it. This, however, was NOT an instance where I was wrong, because it was explicitly shown in the movie, and/or expanded universe materials. It's not speculation, period (it's like claiming Palpatine using electrokinesis is speculation despite literally generating lightning from his fingertips onscreen). Want to know what actually IS speculation, though? Claiming Ariel DIDN'T retain her superhuman endurance upon becoming human. Especially when the scene with Ursula made it FAR too ambiguous to actually say for certain that she didn't retain it (if she truly didn't, she outright disintegrate at the depth she was at, not simply worry about drowning).

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • It has come to my attention that we need to encourage more editing into the Actor pages. Include more than just their film/show roles. They all lack any major contents which is why we delete them from the Wiki. We should try to expand them to include biography dating back to their early lives, leading up to their careers and to when they started working for Disney. There's more to actors than just acting. They have lives and history. Expand them to become more like their Wikipedia predecessors, but in our own words and research. Same goes for other pages on directors, animators, models, artists, musicians, the lot.

    I share this with you because you have experience with research. If you can provide such complex information about characters you could do the same for actual people. It will be a lot of work. Are you up to it?

    Click here for more information: [1]

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Let's get one thing straight Weedle. Ariel has no superhuman abilities and has no super strength. There was never any official confirmation, and what you claim is seen in the film doesn't make it proof. I hereby ban these speculations and don't want you making a fuss about it or giving me one of your long explinations that I don't care about.

    Furthermore we are keeping it simple, and not over written.

      Loading editor
    • Yeah, actually, she did have superhuman abilities and super strength. Otherwise, she would not have moved that boulder an inch (and let me tell you, from what I've heard about diving, if you tried to open a door underwater, no luck, because it fuses shut, and requires tools to breach). And aside from that, she also was able to swim with that weight around her tail.

      Bear in mind also that the guys who did The Little Mermaid had to do a lot of research to get the effects of underwater areas right, meaning they did their homework on studying the physics and landscapes of underwater environments, so they most certainly would have known about those bits.

      And last I checked, if it's in the film (or any expanded universe stuff), it's by definition confirmed. Period. This isn't like, say, Ariel using heat-vision or breathing icy gales where there's literally nothing in the movie to even remotely suggest those as being her powers and only headcanon and made up, this is directly shown in the movie and expanded media.

      And quite frankly, if we were to keep it simple, we'd literally gut the entire article and leave it at five words, "Mermaid who becomes a human." And even you'd recognize that's stupid. Besides, this is an encyclopedia, so we'd need to state literally all the information, not leave anything out. Otherwise, it would turn out like this situation on Bulbapedia: https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=AG177&type=revision&diff=465675&oldid=458141

        Loading editor
    • I told you before I do not care. This is not Disney's research its yours. Personal research. This is my final word on it and if you try to reinsert them again you will be reported.

        Loading editor
    • You don't want to keep it simple, then take your studies elsewhere. Things have changed around here, and with change comes sacrifices.

        Loading editor
    • Hey leave him alone.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Contiuning our conversation because for some reason this site doesnt let me reply back twice its been assumed by many that the king is still fighting the wars that Phoebus came back from so he isnt around to stop Frollo.

      Loading editor
    • Pretty much the only war that might have been occurring at that time was the Italian Wars, after doing some digging.

      Besides, 1482 definitely wasn't a time of war back then either, and Frollo was still doing his antics back then.

        Loading editor
    • Okay so tell me where is the King during all of this? Shouldnt he be trying to stop Frollo? 

        Loading editor
    • Knowing the more anti-Christian messaging of the Disney version, even with the archdeacon (quite frankly, if I must be blunt, depicting one of the gargoyles of Notre Dame as a homosexual was just blasphemous just going by what the Bible says about the activity), I wouldn't even be surprised if Disney thought the king would have tacitly agreed with Frollo in his actions, even the torching of Paris. After all, if the king didn't condone or agree with his actions, Frollo would have at the very least been fired a long time prior, if not executed swiftly.

        Loading editor
    • Okay. So what happened to Frollo's soldiers btw? I like to hope they were imprisoned or exectued for their crimes after all I really dont think "Just following orders" is an excuse for carrying out such sinister deeds.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Was it yours?

    https://writingthemagic.wordpress.com/2014/02/06/belle-is-a-bitch-and-gastons-all-right-beauty-and-the-beasts-character-problems/

    The style, structure and opinions heavily reminded me of you, so I wanted to ask.

      Loading editor
    • Yes, that is indeed me, though just as an FYI, that video was made around 2007, so I'm actually older than that now.

      And just as an FYI, I'm not a snowflake, either. I'm actually against snowflakes.

        Loading editor
    • Weedle McHairybug wrote:
      Yes, that is indeed me, though just as an FYI, that video was made around 2007, so I'm actually older than that now.

      And just as an FYI, I'm not a snowflake, either. I'm actually against snowflakes.

      Okay, so two FYIs.



      Suddenly your views now make sense to me

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • How much control/influence do you think a group of power individuals, whose country sun rises in the east, and who has a large hold in Disney's pocket.  Can demand the company to rethink their company's decision making whether it be filming, marketing, casting, etc?

      Loading editor
    • Can you clarify what exactly you mean by that question? Are you asking if it's possible for the board of directors and/or shareholders for Disney can get them to rethink Disney's decision making for whatever it's doing?

        Loading editor
    • Basically that, but mainly towards how much control does the China have an influence on Disney's decsion making (as they have a rather large hold on the film market)

        Loading editor
    • Elephant777 wrote: Basically that, but mainly towards how much control does the China have an influence on Disney's decsion making (as they have a rather large hold on the film market)

      Well, they certainly have large enough of a hold that the various films have an obligatory promotion of communism to ensure they sell well in China, or well enough at least.

        Loading editor
    • Makes sense, its been weighing on my mind as of late because of how the market seems to be steadily shifting in their favor

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+