Disney should make more Traditional Animated films, for has been a tradition for Disney and that's what Walt Disney would want. We shouldn't let fans just focus on CGI, they should pay attention on both. We should make a petition.
Disney should make more Traditional Animated films, for has been a tradition for Disney and that's what Walt Disney would want. We shouldn't let fans just focus on CGI, they should pay attention on both. We should make a petition.
And I hear Brad Bird might be work on one after The Incredibles 2, whether it be at Warner Bros Feature Animation or an independent studio.
Alpha Baymax wrote:
Walt Disney, Jr. wrote:
Ed Catmull gives a very respectable reason as to why Disney shut down 2D animation...
No it isn't. If the creators of these Disney stories believe that telling their movie in CG is prefferable over Hand Drawn then that's their choice. What would be "wrong and unfair" would be to have Ed Catmull and John Lasseter force Disney Animation be a 2D Hand Drawn Disney Musical studio.
How about Larry D. Whitaker, Jr.? He might be for the director of 2-D hand drawn animation for Disney and Mickey Mouse's faithful dog, Pluto either.
Alpha Baymax wrote:
Walt Disney, Jr. wrote:
Ed Catmull gives a very respectable reason as to why Disney shut down 2D animation...
One person isn't going to change the entire mind of a company.
You know listening to his reasoning is quite pathetic if you think about it.
One not giving a direct answer, but rather indirectly explained it. Then he makes a poor choice of having the directors from both studios in one place openly choose how both studios should cooperate, which is very poor leadership. Another thing is the fact that he felt like is was wrong to have definition!
Disney Animation Studios defined itself long ago as a Traditional Animation Studio
Pixar defined itself long ago as a Computer Generated Animation Studio
This is where it all goes wrong. Now you have people from pixar taking control over the Disney Animation, which is funny because I was wondering why the recent movies from the revival era looked more like Pixar films than Disney.
So in terms of diversity I believe it is a one sideded argument, and the fact that none of them are even willing to try is the equivilant of a dog rolling onto it back so the owner kick him in it most vulnerable spot.
This is a company, not a country. It is in the right of a president of the Disney Company to take an authoritative stance. If directors don't like it then they have the right to quit. That is what Don Bluth did, and he made some of the most unforgettable "traditional animated" films in history.
What makes Disney special is its difference from other animation studios.
Now a days it is getting harder and harder to to tell the differnce between a Pixar film, a BlueSky film, a Dreamworks film, or a Disney aside from their titles
One not giving a direct answer, but rather indirectly explained it. Then he makes a poor choice of having the directors from both studios in one place openly choose how both studios should cooperate, which is very poor leadership. Another thing is the fact that he felt like is was wrong to have definition!
Disney Animation Studios defined itself long ago as a Traditional Animation Studio
Pixar defined itself long ago as a Computer Generated Animation Studio
This is where it all goes wrong. Now you have people from pixar taking control over the Disney Animation, which is funny because I was wondering why the recent movies from the revival era looked more like Pixar films than Disney.
So in terms of diversity I believe it is a one sideded argument, and the fact that none of them are even willing to try is the equivilant of a dog rolling onto it back so the owner kick him in it most vulnerable spot.
This is a company is not a country it is in the right of a president of the Disney Company to take an authoritative stance. If directors don't like it then they have the right to quit. That is what Don Bluth did, and he made some of the most unforgettable "traditional animated" films in history.
What makes Disney special is its difference from other animation studios.
Now a days it is getting harder and harder to to tell the differnce between a Pixar film, a BlueSky film, a Dreamworks film, or a Disney aside from their titles
Good points.
Elephant777 wrote: You know listening to his reasoning is quite pathetic if you think about it.
One not giving a direct answer, but rather indirectly explained it. Then he makes a poor choice of having the directors from both studios in one place openly choose how both studios should cooperate, which is very poor leadership. Another thing is the fact that he felt like is was wrong to have definition!
Disney Animation Studios defined itself long ago as a Traditional Animation Studio
Pixar defined itself long ago as a Computer Generated Animation Studio
This is where it all goes wrong. Now you have people from pixar taking control over the Disney Animation, which is funny because I was wondering why the recent movies from the revival era looked more like Pixar films than Disney.
So in terms of diversity I believe it is a one sideded argument, and the fact that none of them are even willing to try is the equivilant of a dog rolling onto it back so the owner kick him in it most vulnerable spot.
This is a company, not a country. It is in the right of a president of the Disney Company to take an authoritative stance. If directors don't like it then they have the right to quit. That is what Don Bluth did, and he made some of the most unforgettable "traditional animated" films in history.
What makes Disney special is its difference from other animation studios.
Now a days it is getting harder and harder to to tell the differnce between a Pixar film, a BlueSky film, a Dreamworks film, or a Disney aside from their titles
I think a Disney aside from their titles and Larry D. Whitaker, Jr. shall help at the Walt Disney Company with Larry Whitaker Productions or Ghost Train Pictures. That is getting harder and harder to tell the difference to Larry D. Whitaker, Jr. could help.
Well, in 2018, we're getting a new CEO and hopefully he or she will change the animation back to hand drawn animation for good, with maybe using a meander as their replacement for their current CGI animation.
Hope hope.
TsWade2 wrote: Well, in 2018, we're getting a new CEO and hopefully he or she will change the animation back to hand drawn animation for good, with maybe using a meander as their replacement for their current CGI animation.
Alberto Ibargüen was the new CEO of The Walt Disney Company from American Airlines, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc. and you can contact for some hand drawn animation.
This is stupid on so many levels. Bob Iger single handedly saved Disney Aimation and the Walt Disney company in general. I'd rather have Bob Iger's contract extended as opposed to him leaving. Besides, the new CEO isn't gonig to go back to hand drawn just because you said so.