FANDOM


(Created page with "I while back I consulted with User:SilverFlight and User:Hey1234 about terminating the infobox sections "friends" and "enemy". I do not recall their opinions at that t...")
 
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
"Relatives", "Pets", and "Minions" are worth keeping because those are concrete. It would also be a good idea to have a "love interest" section so we can keep non-married love interests in the infoboxes.
 
"Relatives", "Pets", and "Minions" are worth keeping because those are concrete. It would also be a good idea to have a "love interest" section so we can keep non-married love interests in the infoboxes.
   
What is your opinion?<ac_metadata title="Friends and Enemies"> </ac_metadata>
+
I ask for your honest opinion.<ac_metadata title="Friends and Enemies"> </ac_metadata>

Latest revision as of 08:09, April 27, 2019

I while back I consulted with User:SilverFlight and User:Hey1234 about terminating the infobox sections "friends" and "enemy". I do not recall their opinions at that time, but Hey1234 has just recently got back to the subject and is up for it.

Here are the reasons why we should consider terminating "friends" and "enemies". It's becoming difficult to maintain with characters flip-flopping alliances, users adding characters as "friends" even though they've barely interacted, and not knowing where certain characters stand with each other in present day even though they were friends in the past (like King Louie and Kaa).

"Relatives", "Pets", and "Minions" are worth keeping because those are concrete. It would also be a good idea to have a "love interest" section so we can keep non-married love interests in the infoboxes.

I ask for your honest opinion.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.